Re: [ga] The Future of ICANN: A Series of Regional Consultative Meetings

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glen and all,

  Well this is good news.  But it's a bit to late IMO.  ICANN should
have done this 8 years ago when it was first suggested as round
table discussions.  Of course those efforts were resoundingly
ignored and refused.

  From where our members point of view, stakeholders all,
Institutional Confidence has greatly declined, and continues to
decline at an ever excellerating rate.  Ergo where ever you
and/or ICANN is getting it's information must be living in a
bottle of very small proportions.  I guess the old adage,
hear no evil, see no evil has also become an ICANN mantra
as well...  We do believe and have seen for some time now
that a tiny few special interest groups such as Registries, registrars,
Domain Name Tasters, Domain Name Speculators, and Intellectual
Property lobbyists have been very supportive on many of ICANN's
policies.


Glen de Saint Géry wrote:

> [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
>
> The Future of ICANN: A Series of Regional Consultative Meetings
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-15aug08-en.htm
>
> 15 August 2008
>
> A series of regional consultative meetings about crucial changes to ICANN 
> will take place over the next three months in an effort to reach out to and 
> involve the organization's global stakeholders.
>
> Four dates had been set so far*, with at least one other due to be announced 
> shortly. They are:
>
> Tuesday, 19 August: Montevideo, Uruguay
> Tuesday, 26 August: Christchurch, New Zealand.
> Monday, 15 September: Geneva, Switzerland
> Tuesday, 30 September: Washington DC, United States of America
> A further date in Africa will be added shortly.
> The meetings will be a part of ICANN's Improving Institutional Confidence 
> (IIC) consultation that was opened in June following the community's response 
> to the Midterm Review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) that ICANN has 
> with the US Department of Commerce.
>
> To date, three documents have been produced to guide the IIC consultation: a 
> Transition Action Plan; an Improving Institutional Confidence in ICANN 
> document; and an FAQ. All three documents have been produced by the 
> President's Strategy Committee (PSC) of ICANN and they are currently under 
> review by the PSC following a first public comment period that closed on 31 
> July.
>
> The regional consultative meetings will explain the IIC consultation and its 
> aims, and encourage discussion and debate surrounding a number of measures 
> for improving confidence in ICANN both as an organization and as a model for 
> coordinating the Internet's unique identifiers. At least one member of the 
> PSC and one ICANN staff person will be present at each meeting and will help 
> manage it.
>
> More details on the meetings and the consultation can be found online at 
> http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/regional-meetings.htm. Any questions about 
> the meetings or process should be sent to iic@xxxxxxxxx.
>
> ICANN encourages all those in the community to try to take part in one of the 
> sessions and looks forward to engaging with its stakeholders over the next 
> few months.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * With the exception of Washington, the dates coincide with existing meetings 
> where Internet community members and those interested in ICANN issues are 
> already expected to attend.
>
> Glen de Saint G�ry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827