[ga] RIAA Pays Tanya Andersen $107,951. What says ICANN's IPC?

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

  Well, well, yet another sound thrashing, and a costly one for
the RIAA.  What says the IPC?  And bully for Ms Anderson
still going after additional damages for her anguish, ect...

  So than again, when will the IPC take additional action and
revoke the RIAA's membership and demonstrate their support
of users/stakeholders for abusive behavior on the RIAA'a part?
Additionally failing such action by the IPC, when will ICANN
demand that the IPC take such obviously logical action?

See:
 http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/ NewYorkCountryLawyer
writes "Well, Phase I of the RIAA's misguided pursuit of an innocent,
disabled Oregon woman,
http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/01/index-of-litigation-documents.html#Atlantic_v_Andersen

Atlantic v. Andersen, has finally drawn to a close, as the RIAA was
forced
to  http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16724 pay Ms. Andersen $107,951,
representing the amount of her attorneys fee judgment plus interest. But

as some have pointed out,
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=15479871&postID=9080502488456214600

reimbursement for legal fees doesn't compensate Ms. Andersen for the
other damages she's sustained. And that's where Phase II comes in,
http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/01/index-of-litigation-documents.html#Andersen_v_Atlantic

Andersen v. Atlantic.  There the shoe is on the other foot, and Tanya is

one doing the hunting, as she pursues the record companies and their
running dogs for
 
http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2008/05/fourth-amended-complaint-filed-in.html

malicious prosecution. Should be interesting."

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827