<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] [Fwd: Re: [At-Large] Number of Recipients to Mailing Lists]
- To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] [Fwd: Re: [At-Large] Number of Recipients to Mailing Lists]
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:25:01 -0700
All,
See below...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Number of Recipients to Mailing Lists
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:23:46 -0700
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: IDNS and Spokesman for INEGroup
To: At-Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,GAC Rep
<ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: At-Large Worldwide <alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Cheryl Langdon-Orr
<cheryl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <C4B5BDD4.54C7B%staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nick and all,
Thank you for admitting that the chair is interested in censorship.
Such a practice, as you should know is a very questionable one
in that it violates IETF standard, is prelude to a waste of bandwidth,
limits freedom of expression which is also a very questionable
Constitutional issue/violation in the US, is not in keeping with the
MOU, and serves as a significant potential for Forwarding to other
recipients that would normally have been "CC'ed" in the original
post, and BTW, "CC'ing" is not cross posting by definition, and
also serves as an influence on additionally wasting electricity, which
in the present resource conservation movement of such a resource
gives the appearance of misuse under the law intentionally.
In any event, and as a result of this belated notice, I shall resend
my posts of today to ALL of the original recipients separately
in accordance to this horrible and illegitimate notice accordingly.
At-Large Staff wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> In keeping with a request from the Chair of the ALAC, responding to many
> community requests, the total number of recipients of emails to the At-Large
> lists has been limited to five per email.
>
> This is by way of helping to reduce crossposting and of multiple copies of
> the same message being received by recipients who are at the same time
> direct recipients of a message and mailing list members.
>
> If you receive a bounce from the mailing lists, and you are subscribed and
> routinely are able to send emails to that list, please look at the number of
> recipients the message had.
> --
> Regards,
>
> Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Frederic Teboul
> ICANN At-Large Staff
> email: staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|