[ga] Re: [governance] Much-maligned feature being added to IPv6

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Phil and all,

  Already read it, but thanks anyway.  And yes it was quite interesting.

Phil Regnauld wrote:

> Jeffrey A. Williams (jwkckid1) writes:
> >
> >   Frankly I personally view this as a very positive step for IPv6.
> > Breaches a ideological
> > technical divide that has existed for nearly a decade, which is a good
> > first step
> > in gaining more acceptance for IPv6.  The downside is that LEA's won't
> > like it very much for obvious reasons.
>
>         Read Alain Durand's proposal for a very interesting solution on the
>         transition for large broadband providers:
>
>         http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00
>
>         (it is cited in the article and is by far more interesting than
>         the whole NAT or no NAT discussion).
>
>

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827