Re: [ga] Re: Potential Danger Ahead for Registrants -- dot-info Abusive Domain Use Policy

[JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 06:00 19/07/2008, George Kirikos wrote:
> Hello,
> Just to followup, it appears ICANN has approved the Afilias policy,
> without even a formal public comment period:
>
> http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/jones-to-afilias-18jul08.pdf
>
> I think this might require a reconsideration request or some other
> action to appeal.
Dear George,
you know better about this case. May be you might:

- document the abusive use Affilias policy highlighting the points 
making a formal public comment period required.
- present the formal demand for a reconsideration or appeal as 
collectively signed by identified GA Members.
If we want to make sure that the IIC strategy presented by ICANN, 
which calls for a consolidation of the ICANN practices,  is a good 
strategy we must first make sure that ICANN respects its own rules, 
or has good documented reasons not to respect them. How could we know 
otherwise what is the best for ICANN and users to consolidate.
Actually, it would be a good thig to create an IIC (Improving 
Institutional Confidence) Committee (IICC) to analyse and check in 
real conditions what the post-JPA ICANN should be/do. Keeping in mind 
that the main issues are: Internal Governance, IPv6, new TLDs, 
ML-DNS, people centrism, IGF involvement and IANA distribution. The 
last six areas where ICANN still has a very low or confuse experience 
necessarily impacting the first area, that should preserved through a 
"management by the book" approach.
Such an IICC could help in presenting and noting every ICANN decision 
about these 7 points. I am ready to rebuild and dedicate the 
http://wikicann.org site to such a work. Making it a book of ICANN 
decisions and procedures by the people for the real people ?
Who could be interested ?
jfc