ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] RSTEP Report on PIR's Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG

  • To: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx, icann-board@xxxxxxxxx, dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] RSTEP Report on PIR's Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:35:16 -0400 (EDT)

Glen and all,

  Thank you Glen for sharing this good news however belated
it may be.

  As you and most attentive GA'ers know, all of our members
have as of either 3 years ago and/or as a matter of membership
requirement implimented DNSSEC for their Domain Names.  

  Now if we/ICANN can only get IPSEC as a manditory requirement
for all Registries and Registrars implimented, which in our
members opinion should have been a manditory requirement for
all TLD and IP registries and Domain Name Registrars from the 
outset circa 1999 as I repeatedly and clearly articulated
in bahalf of our members at that time.

-----Original Message-----
>From: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 6, 2008 4:07 AM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] RSTEP Report on PIR's Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG
>
>
>[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
>[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
>[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
>
>http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-05jun08-en.htm
>
>RSTEP Report on PIR's Request to Implement DNSSEC in .ORG
>5 June 2008
>
>On 21 April 2008, ICANN referred Public Interest Registry (PIR)'s
>proposed implementation
>(http://icann.org/registries/rsep/pir-request-03apr08.pdf) [PDF, 205K]
>of DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) in .ORG to the Registry Services
>Technical Evaluation Panel (RSTEP). In accordance with the Registry
>Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP)
>(http://icann.org/registries/rsep/rsep.html), the RSTEP had 45 calendar
>days to review the proposal and prepare a written report on whether the
>proposed Registry Service creates a reasonable risk of a meaningful
>adverse effect on Security or Stability. The RSTEP Review Team completed
>its report that can be found at
>http://icann.org/registries/rsep/rstep-report-pir-dnssec-04jun08.pdf
>[PDF, 481K]. Very briefly, the technical evaluation found that the
>proposed implementation of DNSSEC, "does create a reasonable risk of a
>meaningful adverse effect on security and stability, which can be
>effectively mitigated by policies, decisions, and actions to which !
>  PIR
>either has expressly committed in its proposal or could reasonably be
>required to commit."
>
>The Review Team consisted of the following members:
>
>Patrik Fältström (Cisco; USA)
>Paul Hoffman (VPN Consortium, USA) (Chair)
>Mark Kosters (ARIN, USA)
>Frederico A C Neves (NIC.br, Brasil)
>Andrew Sullivan (Command Prompt, Canada)
>
>Under the terms of the RSEP, following receipt of the RSTEP report, the
>ICANN Board will determine whether the proposed Registry Service creates
>a reasonable risk of a meaningful adverse effect on Stability or Security.
>
>ICANN invites public comments on the RSTEP Report through 20 June 2008
>23:59 UTC. Comments can be submitted to pir-dnssec-proposal@xxxxxxxxx,
>and viewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/pir-dnssec-proposal/. All
>documents related to the PIR proposal are available at
>http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/#2008004.
>
>The Board is expected to consider the RSTEP Report and PIR's proposal
>following synthesis and reporting of the public comment.
>-- 
>Glen de Saint Géry
>GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
>gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
>http://gnso.icann.org
>
>

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>