[ga] Fw: Re: [NA-Discuss] CONFIRMED: Briefing Session on Draft Operational Plan and Budget

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

FYI:

-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 5, 2008 1:20 PM
>To: dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx, "na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
><na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, At-Large Staff 
><staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, aheineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 
>gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Kevin@xxxxxxxxx, Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, Wilson 
><kevin.wilson@xxxxxxxxx>, doug.brent@xxxxxxxxx, jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx, 
>wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx, namecritic@xxxxxxxx, dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx, 
>karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, twomey@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] CONFIRMED: Briefing Session on Draft Operational     
>Plan and Budget
>
>Danny and all,
>
>  I second Dannys request/questions.  ???  I also believe that
>it was Danny several years back that posed or requested this
>exact same information regarding .com and .org, and was rebuffed.
>
>  So this time around, perhaps, and lets hope, that full disclosure
>as required by law, will be forthcoming.  If not, perahps suit
>requesting a full audit, as Karl A. did some years back will
>again be an alternitive method for gaining full disclosure.  Or
>even perhaps Chris's suit in the process of e-discovery will
>request from the court, a full audit that will render this
>requested information.
>
>  Of course as always we all hope that ICANN will be wise
>enough that such distasteful methods will not be necessary,
>and that accountability and transparency will prevail voluntairly...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Jun 5, 2008 12:54 PM
>>To: "na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
>><na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, At-Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Cc: Kevin@xxxxxxxxx, Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, Wilson 
>><kevin.wilson@xxxxxxxxx>, doug.brent@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] CONFIRMED: Briefing Session on Draft Operational    
>>Plan and Budget
>>
>>This question is posed in advance of the briefing to Kevin and Doug:
>>
>>The .net registry contract states:
>>
>>Section 7.2  Fees to be Paid to ICANN
>>a)  Registry-Level Transaction Fee. Commencing on 1 July 2005, Registry 
>>Operator shall pay ICANN a Registry-Level Transaction Fee in an amount equal 
>>to US$0.75 for each annual increment of an initial or renewal domain name 
>>registration and for transferring a domain name registration from one 
>>ICANN-accredited registrar to another during the calendar quarter to which 
>>the Registry-Level Transaction Fee pertains. ICANN intends to apply this fee 
>>to purposes including: (a) a special restricted fund for developing country 
>>Internet communities to enable further participation in the ICANN mission by 
>>developing country stakeholders, (b) a special restricted fund to enhance and 
>>facilitate the security and stability of the DNS, and (c) general operating 
>>funds to support ICANN's mission to ensure the stable and secure operation of 
>>the DNS.
>>
>>Could you please advise:
>>
>>(1)  The total amount of fees obtained by way of this portion of the .net 
>>contract
>>(2)  The amount allocated to the special restricted fund for developing 
>>country communities (and by what means it will be dispersed)
>>(3)  The amount allocated to the security and stability restricted fund (and 
>>how such funds are spent)
>>(4)  The amount allocated to the general operating fund.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Danny Younger
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>>
>>------
>>NA-Discuss mailing list
>>NA-Discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>------
>
>Regards,
>
>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
>very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
>liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>===============================================================
>Updated 1/26/04
>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
>div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>My Phone: 214-244-4827