[ga] Re: [At-Large] Do they exist or what

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

JFC and all,

  I think LB has hit on a very good point.  The ALAC in it's
current form cannot reasonably represent users world wide
as it is predominantly a "Closed shop".  

-----Original Message-----
>From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 2, 2008 7:53 PM
>To: LB <lbleriot@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: listegenerale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [At-Large] Do they exist or what
>
>At 23:11 02/06/2008, LB wrote:
>>I propose a motion: france@wide having found that ALAC does not exist,
>>and considering that it is necessary to have an ALAC, propose to
>>@larges worldwide to resume this good idea and create a World At Large
>>Advisory Council (WALAC).
>
>Louis,
>you are going to confuse everyone.
>
>1. I suppose that "france@wide" is a Google Traduction's fancy.
>
>- france@large is a French ALS incorporated in 2000 pretty active 
>ever since as an @large organisation which decided to reorganise to 
>welcome the other @large people in Paris.
>
>- world@wide is a small foundation specialising in offering free 
>domain name protection and hosting to Internet Governance and @large 
>oriented projects.
>
>2. we plan your "oualalac" (I understand it meens an "open use, at 
>large, alac" get to gether diner in Paris. We wait for the answer of 
>Wolf to know to best answer the Staff suggestion. Sebastien already answered.
>
>3. The WALAC/IALAC names could be misused: I asked world@wide to 
>protect them as domain names.
>
>4. I suggest we do not discuss anymore the ALAC decision concerning 
>france@large. This is something that we first have to discuss in 
>detail with Euralo as they proposed. And possibly transfer to the 
>Ombudsman and BoD if it is confirmed there were influences.
>
>I would suggest that you use your mailing broadsides to help me 
>cooling down the situation. We now have enough ways to practically 
>protect the individual @larges' interests without making noise or in 
>invading the ICANN meeting (however fun that could be). They want to 
>ignore us as you underline it, may be should we do the same ? This is 
>a question I raise.
>
>Everyone knows now they did not want us to vote at the first Euralo 
>Summit. This is over now. Probably better we just delegate a few 
>people at the ICANN meeting and we report at Saturday 28 
>InternetCamp, sending them photos, rather than to repeat the Olympic 
>Flame incidents?
>
>OK?
>
>jfc
>
>___
>
>Louis,
>tu va confuser tout le monde !
>
>1. Je suppose qie "france@wide" est une blague de Google Traduction.
>
>- france@large est une ALS française incoporée en 2000 et assez 
>active depuis en tant qu'organisation @large qui a décidé de se 
>réorganiser pour accueillir les autres @larges à Paris.
>
>- world@wide est une petite fondation specialisée dans l'offre 
>gratuite de protection de noms de domaine et d'hébergement pour les 
>projets orientés vers la Gouvernance de l'Internet et les @larges.
>
>2. Nous planifions ton diner de rencontre "oualalac (que je comprends 
>comme "open use, at large, alac") à Paris. Nous attendins la réponse 
>de World pour savoir comment répondre au mieux à la suggestion du 
>Staff. Sébastien a déjà répondu.
>
>3. Les noms WALAC et IALAC pourraient être dangereux. J'ai demandé à 
>world@wide de les enregistrer en protection.
>
>4. Je suggère que nous ne discutions plus de la décision ALAC 
>concernant france@large. C'est quelque chose que nous avons d'abord à 
>discuster avec Euralo puisqu'ils l'ont proposé. Nous aurons 
>probablement à le transferer ensuite à l'Ombudsman et au CA s'il se 
>confirme qu'il y a eu des interférences.
>
>Je te suggèrerais de réserver tes "bordées de haute-mail" à l'aider à 
>détendre la situation. Nous avons déhà gagné suffisament d'avantages 
>pour protéger concrêtement les interêts des @large individuels sans 
>avoir à faire du bruit inutile qui peut être mal compris, ou à 
>envahir la réunion ICANN (bien que je conçois que cela pourrait être 
>très amusant). Ils veulent nous ignorer comme tu le soulignes; 
>peut-être devrions nous faire de même. C'est une question que je pose.
>
>Tout le monde sait maintenant qu'ils ne voulait pas que nous votions 
>au premier sommet européen. Ceci est entendu maintenant. Il est donc 
>probablemnt mieux que nous leur déléguions que quelques personne lors 
>du meeting ICANN, et que nous fassions le point à l'InternetCamp de 
>la Grande Arche le samedi 28 (leur envoyant des photos), plutot que 
>de renouveller les incidents de la Flame Olympique.
>
>OK ?
>jfc
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827