ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:51:09 -0700 (PDT)

Re:  "identifying the workaround"

I would think that arrangements regarding the
settlement of fraud claims can be built into the
Credits section in the Service Level Agreement within
the relevant registry-registrar agreements.

regards,
Danny



--- Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Jeff,
> 
> I also understand Ross's concerns about the impact
> of the AGP
> elimination associated with registrars. Those
> affecting the registration
> test process. I have not noticed any other more
> serious Ross's concerns.
> On the other hand, the concept of AGP is so
> extremely abusive, even in
> smaller volume, that we should try looking for an
> alternative
> workaround. In many production systems the test
> environment is
> accomplished by alternative/duplicate systems or
> using different
> approaches, all with no AGP help at all. So this is
> principally doable.
> See also Chris's comments on the topic. As for me, I
> am keen on helping
> identify the workaround, if desired.
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>