ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] John Baxter says the INS is here. Indeed it is.

  • To: "John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] John Baxter says the INS is here. Indeed it is.
  • From: "Joe Baptista" <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:02:59 -0400

John Baxter (or is that Palmer) - your new found nerviness concerns me.  I
appreciate your support for the inclusive name space.  However the fact that
you have been actively involved with an organization that has misrepresented
the inclusive name space, bothers me. An organization that is run by one
Herman Xennt, an associate of yours, who is currently under investigation by
the very people you praise.  This concerns me.

One of the nice things about the inclusive name space is that unlike ICANN
it is community based.  And any fraud such as the type you have been
associated with is quickly dealt with.  So maybe this new found support of
yours has something to do with repentance?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:01 PM, John Palmer <
jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Yes, the ugly saga of ICANN. You know, the Inclusive Namespace is out
> there
> still, with roots


Incorrect.  There  is an inclusive name space zone file published at least
once per week.  However there is no official inclusive name space root or
roots.  There are roots that claim to be inclusive name space compliant, but
they all more or less fail testing.


>
> such as publicroot.com and worldroot.net and organizations like TLDA (just
> restarted, I hear)


Lets hope this is not the beginning of another Baxter fraud.  As far as I
know there is no root at publicroot.com.  I think you meant
public-root.comwhere you are the G root operator.

http://public-root.com/g-root.htm

This root which is properly known as INAIC - www inaic.com - is under
investigation by the TLDA, and the Dutch Public Prosecutors office,  if not
others.  I don't think this is a good root for you to recommend to recommend
and claim in any way they are an inclusive name space root.  At this time
the TLDA has not ruled on them nor certified those roots.

I will be opposed to certification because there are serious ethics issues
with the people you provide root service too.  Lets consider this
recommendation of Mr. Palmers a conflict of interest.

Now worldroot.net is an run by the same Mr. Palmer who is recommending it.
The worldroot.net I suspect is either a project just of Mr. Palmer's.  Its a
private root of Mr. Palmer's.  I am concerned it is an attempt to brand a
new root for his friend Herman Xennt to continue defrauding people.  I'm
going to assume Mr. Palmer is genuine about the worldroot.net.

But let us not forget John that you created a TLD in the worldroot recently
called .BAX which is associated with a bogus administrator.  Recently we
uncovered that you Mr. John Palmer were Mr. Thom Baxter and you attempted to
be a member of the TLDA using a false identity.

This was wrong.  John was shamed before the community, and appropriately so,
for participating in the fraudulent sale of TLDs.  Just being associated
with the fraudsters in the Netherlands is enough to sink any respect the
community had for John.  But creating a false identity to gain entry into
the TLDA was unethical.

And from a technical perspective the worldroot.net root system fails
compliance tests.  The root John runs is based on the INAIC.com root, which
fails inclusive name space compatibility.

People - if any of you want to join the inclusive name space the only place
to do it is at www.tldainc.org - thats where the community is.  Thats where
the people power that is the new internet is at.

For all the griping about ICANN, I don't see many folks who are complaining
> about them come
> over and assist the INS institutions in gaining greater use and viability.





>
>
> Remember, we are still out here and have always been ready to serve as an
> alternative to
> ICANN. Perhaps those who want to see alternatives should come over and
> help.
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>