Re: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory Committee

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dominik and all,

  Percisely correct!  And what I have been advocating for our
members sense 2002.  But of course the than seated ICANN
board were very concerned, or I would say scared to distraction
of an Independant Registrants Constituency, if one looks back in
the GA archives of such as well as being scared to distraction of
a Users Constituency and/or fully open @large.  I believe this fear
remains to this very day!

Dominik Filipp wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Peter Dengate Thrush
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 7:46 AM
> To: Danny Younger
> Cc: twomey@xxxxxxxxx; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; At-Large Worldwide
> Subject: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory Committee
>
> . . .
>
> >> While ICANN has numerous advisory committees and supporting
> >> organizations whose responsibilities include putting forth the
> general
> >> registrant interest as a part of their duties, the sad reality has
> >> been that immediate registrant concerns rarely find a dedicated
> >> organizational advocate to spearhead policy development activities.
> >>
> >> What is needed is an Advisory Body whose "sole focus"
> >> is upon the needs of the general registrant community whose funds
> >> support and drive the ICANN process.
> >>
>
> > This may be a useful development.
> > I should need to see it carefully distinguished, with advantages
> > and disadvantages laid out and contested between the current user
> > groups (Business and Non Commercial constituencies of GNSO), and
> > the At Large I appreciate that registrants are not, as a group,
> > necessarily a subset of "user", or of At Large, as it includes
> > the domaineers who are registrants for trading and profit -
> > is it their interests in particular that you feel are not being
> > served by the current structure?
>
> In fact, we need more than just a Registrant Advisory Committee. We need
> a fully-fledged Registrant Constituency with all the voting power. Why?
> For simple and logical reason. The Registrants stay on top of the
> financial chain generating income for ICANN. Without the need for domain
> names there would be no need for either Registries or Registrars or
> ISPs. Thus Registrants, though indirectly, is the very first gear wheel
> in the income machinery.
> The Registrant Constituency should have been the very first constituency
> established within the ICANN structures when ICANN was formed. And the
> most influential as it indeed deserves. Without such representation
> ICANN can barely hold its claim as being an advocate of all internet
> users or stakeholders.
>
> . . .
>
> Regards
>
> Dominik Filipp
>
> > You can make this happen, and ICANN will benefit from such a
> > contribution.
> >
> > best regards,
> > Danny Younger
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/
> > newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>
> Peter Dengate Thrush
> barrister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827