ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Wallpapering the NTIA

  • To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Wallpapering the NTIA
  • From: Karl Peters - TLDA <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:42:10 -0500
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title></title>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
<style type="text/css"><!--
body {
  margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
  background-color: #ffffff;
}
/* ========== Text Styles ========== */
hr { color: #000000}
body, table /* Normal text */
{
 font-size: 10pt;
 font-family: 'Arial';
 font-style: normal;
 font-weight: normal;
 color: #000000;
 text-decoration: none;
}
span.rvts1 /* Heading */
{
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0000ff;
}
span.rvts2 /* Subheading */
{
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #000080;
}
span.rvts3 /* Keywords */
{
 font-style: italic;
 color: #800000;
}
a.rvts4, span.rvts4 /* Jump 1 */
{
 color: #008000;
 text-decoration: underline;
}
a.rvts5, span.rvts5 /* Jump 2 */
{
 color: #008000;
 text-decoration: underline;
}
span.rvts6
{
 font-size: 9pt;
}
span.rvts7
{
 font-size: 9pt;
}
/* ========== Para Styles ========== */
p,ul,ol /* Paragraph Style */
{
 text-align: left;
 text-indent: 0px;
 padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
 margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
}
.rvps1 /* Centered */
{
 text-align: center;
}
--></style>
</head>
<body>

<p><span class=rvts6>&gt;&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts6>&gt; I'm sure that people who disagree will have plenty of 
other websites who</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts6>&gt; propose critical statements.</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts6>&gt; Cheers,</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts6>&gt; Roberto</span></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><span class=rvts7>From how many of those "other" websites will thoughts be 
gleaned from in order to determine a consensus? ... It is the consensus builder 
that has responsibility to the community at large to enable criticism and 
commentary to be heard from all by those who propose to form and deliver the 
consensus result. Merely noting grievances elsewhere than where decisions will 
be made is akin to writing your votes in an election on a piece of paper and 
throwing them in a well. Yes, you have expressed yourself, but can be assured 
your vote will have no value or impact. If this is the opportunity offered to 
those who may disagree, the resulting decision can be considered nothing other 
than a determination by a few to rule the rest. (Typical ICANN!)</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts7>-Karl E. Peters</span></p>

</body></html>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>