<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: Successful Evaluations of .test IDN TLDs
- To: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: Successful Evaluations of .test IDN TLDs
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:28:51 +0100
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:51:19AM +0100,
GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 46 lines which said:
> Therefore, the Automomica test raised no issue regarding the ability
> of root-severs and iterative mode resolvers to handle IDN TLD
> queries.
A lot of money wasted for an almost useless result. Did ICANN tested
anything before introducing ".cat" or ".museum"? For the standard (RFC
3490), IDN are, in the DNS, perfectly ordinary domain names and there
is no reason they behave differently.
One can wonder why ICANN performed these tests. To make believe that
IDN are a dangerous and questionable thing?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|