Re: [ga] Extension input period Issue Report IDN ccPDP

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glen and all,

  Thank you for sending this along.  My question is, amongst
other questions which were posed before the " Issues Report"
was put out and those question were not addressed in said
report, is why are only now after the fact, are ONLY comments
"that are potentially relevant to the Issues Report" to be considered
or relevant to IDN?

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827


"GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:

> [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
>
> Please note that the public comment period has been extended to 22
> February 2008 for input to the Issues Report IDN ccPDP
> http://ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-22jan08.htm
>
> Dear all,
>
> At its meeting on 2 October 2007 the ccNSO Council requested the
> creation of an Issue Report as a first step in launching a ccPDP. To
> identify matters that are potentially relevant to the Issues Report, a
> comment period was opened on 19 December 2007 and would remain open
> until 25 January 2008.
>
> In the Issue Report the following needs to be considered:
> 1.      Whether Article IX of the ICANN bylaws applies to IDN ccTLDs
> associated with the ISO 3166-1 two letter codes, and if it does not then
> to establish if Article IX should apply.
> 2.      Whether the ccNSO should launch a PDP to develop the policy for the
> selection and delegation of IDN ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1
> two-letter codes.
>
> As you may have noted both the GNSO Council and ccNSO Council have send
> a letter to the ICANN Board relating to core elements of the IDN ccPDP.
> It is anticipated the ccNSO and GNSO Council will meet during the ICANN
> meeting in New Delhi to explain and discuss the background of the views
> expressed in the letters. It is my view as Issue Manager of the ccPDP
> that the outcome of such a meeting, if it will be convened, is
> significant as input for the Issues Report. Therefore the period to
> provide input into the Issues Report is extended from 25 January until
> 22 February 2008.
>
> According to the ICANN by laws the creation of the Issue Report is the
> second step in launching the IDN ccPDP. The first step was the request
> of the ccNSO Council on 2 October 2007 to create an Issue Report. The
> final step is  the decision of the ccNSO Council to initiate the ccPDP
> (see ICANN by laws Annex B, section 2).
>
> Kind regards,
> Bart Boswinkel
> Issue Manager IDN ccPDP
>
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org