Re: [ga] Re: IPv6 and root servers
Stephane - its good to see you don't get played the fool for too long. Yes Stephane your questions are very valid. Where is the data from a real root server supporting these claims. regards joe baptista Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:17:35AM +0100,Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 13 lines which said:[SAC021]: Survey of IPv6 Support Among Commercial Firewalls (5 October 2007)Seems to have no relationship with the root name servers.[SAC018]: Accommodating IP Version 6 Address Resource Records for the Root of the Domain Name System (23 March 2007)Mostly a theoretical analysis. Some tests of various systems were performed but I see no data from root name servers. That's a pity because one of the questions asked is "How prevalent is EDNS0?" and I see no measurement of the percentage of EDNS0 requests at a real root name server. Since I see many root name servers operators in the list of authors, I conclude they did not measure this or they do not wish to make it public.[SAC017]: Testing Recursive Name Servers for IPv6 and EDNS0 Support (12 February 2007)Same thing.[SAC016]: Testing Firewalls for IPv6 and EDNS0 Support (30 January 2007)Again, no data from the real root name servers. -- Joe Baptista www.publicroot.org PublicRoot Consortium ---------------------------------------------------------------- The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office: +1 (202) 517-1593 Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084 begin:vcard fn:Joe Baptista n:Baptista;Joe org:PublicRoot Consortium adr:;;963 Ford Street;Peterborough;Ontario;K9J 5V5 ;Canada email;internet:baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx title:PublicRoot Representative tel;fax:+1 (509) 479-0084 tel;cell:+1 (416) 912-6551 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.publicroot.org version:2.1 end:vcard
|