ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Proposed Advisory

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Proposed Advisory
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:25:22 -0600 (GMT-06:00)

Danny, Karen and all,

  Wasn't this matter discussed ad nausium about a year and
a half ago and determined as Danny rightly states below
"A registrant change to Whois information is not a valid 
basis for denying a transfer request", essentially the conclusion?
I believe it was.  So why than is this being rehashed?  Why
are these denials or transfer, seeming registrar abuse, 
continuing? Whom is in charge of the hen house, or should I say 
Mad house?

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827


-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Dec 3, 2007 6:53 AM
>To: Kieren McCarthy <kierenmccarthy@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] Proposed Advisory
>
>
>Kieren,
>
>A question has been posed on the Public Participation
>website; could we trouble you to look into this...
>
>"Status of the Proposed Advisory?
>What is the status of this Proposed Advisory, to stop
>this practice?
>
>http://www.icann.org/announcements/proposed-advisory-19sep07.htm
>
>Network Solutions is STILL blocking domain transfers,
>if the domain owner updates their contact info, even
>though the advisory clearly states "A registrant
>change to Whois information is not a valid basis for
>denying a transfer request." I suspect GoDaddy hasn't
>stopped doing this either.
>
>What is the next step, after hearing public comments
>on this proposed advisory?"
>http://public.icann.org/node/244#comment-661
>
>
>
>
>
>      
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
>http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>