Re: [ga] Questions for Joe Baptista / Eric Dierker, and why the GA list should be ended

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 18 sep 2007, at 07.24, JFC Morfin wrote:

> the so-called GNSO/GA approved by the GNSO includes t
I would like to make clear that the only thing the GSNO council  
'approved' was the proposal for the 'GA list' to try self govern  
according to a set of by-laws and processes.
The council explicitly gave no judgement on any of the organizational  
issues some people on the 'GA List'  may be discussing.  The GSNO  
takes no position regarding an entity called 'GA' except to indicate  
that no such entity currently exists as part of ICANN, though it did  
historically, and that such an entity if it does currently exist,  
does _not_ speak for ICANN or as any part of ICANN.
The 'GA List'  is an email list, under GNSO guidelines, open to all  
subscribers and is maintained by ICANN for the purpose of discussing  
GSNO and other ICANN related issues.
Avri