ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dow2tf] Posting per jeff neuman's request

  • To: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, <dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [dow2tf] Posting per jeff neuman's request
  • From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:30:15 -0400
  • Cc: "Jeff Neuman" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcRNW79eaW5Vt6WsTa+xfB2ilsfsSwAAHBsg
  • Thread-topic: Posting per jeff neuman's request

Given that I can't be on the call, and was counting on having documents to review and provide comments to my colleague, David Fares, so that the BC can be represented.... Can we please hear from the ICANN staff on whether there will be a document, or not? 
I appreciate that everyone is busy, but keeping informed about whether there will be a document, or not, will allow us to consider whether to have the meeting or not.
We are all busy people, with job responsibilities.  Many of us schedule other meetings around time commitments and have limited flexibility. 
The time we spend needs to be productive as possible.

Marilyn S. Cade 
AT&T Law & Government Affairs 
1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 1000N 
Washington, DC 20036 

281-664-9731 e-fax 
202-360-1196 c 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Metalitz [mailto:metalitz@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:23 AM
To: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jeff Neuman
Subject: [dow2tf] Posting per jeff neuman's request 

See attached.  I don't agree with Jeff, I think a call without a document to work from is unlikely to be very productive.  

Steve Metalitz 

<<RE: Joint Whois TF1 and 2 call?>> 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>