Re: [dow2tf] Revised draft
Perhaps a way to address your concern without giving the impression that there are changes to the substance of the recommendations would be to borrow from the recommendation in 3.5. Specifically, I might suggest:
"The task force believes that a system that provides different data sets for different uses (also known as "tiered access") may serve as a useful mechanism to balance the privacy interests of registrants with the ongoing need to contact those registrants by other members of the Internet community, subject to reaching consensus on viability, balance of interests and financial feasibility."
The first half of that sentence is verbatim from 3.5, and the last half leaves us with Maggie's original summary of the ongoing questions to be resolved on this issue.
On May 26, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Steve Metalitz wrote:
I believe that the circulated draft language of Sec. 1.4 mis-states the substance of the recommendation in 3.5, so I recommend that we change the summary to be consistent with the recommendation. This is not an 11th hour change to substance. As we have all agreed, the summary in sec. 1.4 could not be completed until the recommendations themselves were completed.