RE: [dow2tf] Local law recommendations
In the attached I have tried to combine Tom's and my drafts of these recommendations. This retains the structure of Tom's draft: first, those steps that should be followed in all cases of conflict with local privacy law, then the consultation steps which should initiate the process if possible. Tom's draft draws a distinction between conflicts with existing regulations and with new regulations, and includes the consultation steps only in the latter case. I question whether that 's the best place to draw the line: the most common example (to the extent that any of these conflicts becomes common) may be a conflict with existing law that comes to the attention of the registrar/registry in a situation other than a formal complaint. In this circumstance I believe it makes sense to encourage consultation with ICANN to the extent possible before a change is made. I think we are quite close to agreement on this aspect of the report and hope that these suggestions will be acceptable to Tom and our colleagues. Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:38 AM To: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [dow2tf] Local law recommendations Hi, please find enclosed the recommendations for the local law section. Best, tom -- Thomas Keller Domain Services Schlund + Partner AG Brauerstrasse 48 Tel. +49-721-91374-534 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany Fax +49-721-91374-215 http://www.schlund.de tom@xxxxxxxxxx Attachment:
revised local law recommendations 051904.doc |