RE: [dow2tf] Proxy Services

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> A registrar representative stated that
> his constituency was more comfortable
> with a tiered access model than with
> proxy services.

As an RC alternate for this Task Force I take issue with this statement.
There is absolutely no evidence that the majority of the RC supports this
statement, and we should be careful not characterize it that way.

The RC has NOT voted on any position statement and only a handful has
actually weighed in on any of these issues.

I request that either the above statement be revised, or that our Rep revise
his statement to be more accurate, such as:

"A registrar representative stated that his constituency may be more
comfortable with a tiered access model than with proxy services, but that no
consensus has yet been reached."

Regards,
Tim



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 6:35 PM
To: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dow2tf] Proxy Services

Please find attached a short summary of points on proxy services
that I could recall or reconstruct from the existing record.  There
weren't any "findings" of the task force as a whole, as far as I
recall.

Much of this is based on notes from various conference calls that
were prepared and shared by Glen; thanks a lot for this!

Unfortunately, it seems like no notes are available from the 21
April and 29 April conference calls.  For 21 April, there is an MP3
that I'll listen to as soon as I find the time; for 29 April, no MP3
seems to be available.

For this reason, the summary of points is probably skewed towards
the points I remember I made or responded to directly; I'd welcome
any additions you might have.

Apologies for submitting this so late and in relatively poor
quality.
-- 
Thomas Roessler . Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.