RE: [dow1-2tf] BC contribution to TF

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just to add another data point.

In .au, there is differentiated access.

The port 43 WHOIS service and public website, only supply the registrar
of record, the name of the registrant, and an email contact.  The postal
address, phone numbers, and expiry dates are not publicly available.

See http://whois.ausregistry.com.au

Here is an example output:
Domain Name: melbourneit.com.au
Last Modified: 06-Jan-2003 23
Registrar ID: R00010-AR
Registrar Name: Melbourne IT
Status: OK
Registrant: Melbourne IT LTD
Registrant ID: ACN 073 716 793
Registrant ROID: C0938885-AR
Registrant Contact Name: Account Manager
Registrant Email: cdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tech ID: C0938885-AR
Tech Name: Account Manager
Tech Email: cdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Name Server: ns2.melbourneit.com.au
Name Server IP: 203.27.227.50
Name Server: ns1.melbourneit.com.au
Name Server IP: 203.31.198.196


The full information can be provided on a formal request in writing to
the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA).

Regards,
Bruce
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2005 3:35 AM
> To: Marilyn Cade
> Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxx; David Fares
> Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] BC contribution to TF
> 
> .DE also has differentiated access. If you use the port 43 
> access, you only learn whether the domain exists. For more 
> details you have to use the website and agree first, that you 
> will not abuse etc. And you won't get a phone number or email 
> address, BTW. That is how I remember it. The whois part of 
> the website is at present under maintenance...
> 
> Marc Schneiders
> NCUC Council Rep
> 
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, at 10:56 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
> 
> > Sorry for late posting.
> >
> > The BC would like to propose that included in the work of the TF 
> > should be the examination of two existing forms of "tiered access":
> >     Anonomizing services
> >     .post
> >
> > Both are forms of tiered access and we recommend that they 
> be included 
> > in the analysis of the TF.
> >
> > Secondly, we repeat our request to have sessions with 
> invited guests 
> > from ca; .name, and the Chair of the SSAC. We would like to 
> see those 
> > conducted along the lines of the IRIS/CRISP presentatation, but it 
> > seems to us that name and .ca could be scheduled for the 
> same call. We 
> > would also like to have the TF issue an invitation to any 
> cc's who are 
> > using "differentiated access" to WHOIS data as a way to learn about 
> > the experience of existing users of such an approach.
> >
> > Again,sorry to be late. I've been tied up a bit.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > See you in two min.
> >
> > Marilyn Cade
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:32 PM
> > To: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [dow1-2tf] FW: Presentation for tomorrow's call
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Newton [mailto:anewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:22 PM
> > To: Gnso. Secretariat
> > Cc: Jordyn A. Buchanan; Neuman, Jeff; Marilyn Cade; Marcos 
> Sanz/Denic; 
> > Leslie Daigle
> > Subject: Presentation for tomorrow's call
> >
> >
> > Attached you will find the presentation for tomorrow's Whois Task 
> > Force conference call.
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > -andy
> >
> 
>