ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dow1-2tf] mission creep

  • To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] mission creep
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:34:58 -0700
  • Cc: Milton Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>, dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx, marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Then that's what it should say. It doesn't. And at least one of the
elected Reps has agreed. This should not be about what anyone's idea of
ICANN's mission is. <BR><BR>
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: Re:
[dow1-2tf] mission creep<BR>From: "Thomas Roessler"
&lt;roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Fri, November 26, 2004
5:09 am<BR>To: "Tim Ruiz" &lt;tim@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Cc: "Milton
Mueller" &lt;mueller@xxxxxxx&gt;,
marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><BR>On 2004-11-26 04:04:45 -0700, Tim Ruiz
wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp;A general statement that decisions
should be within ICANN's<BR>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp;mission, period, would be
sufficient (but even that goes<BR>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp;without saying
anyway).<BR><BR>The point of the statement is (as discussed on the
conference call)<BR>that the board should grant exceptions in the WHOIS
context to the<BR>degree feasible without jeopardizing blah blah
blah<BR><BR>So it's not about imposing limits, but about saying "go as
far as<BR>you can without going off limits."<BR><BR>-- <BR>Thomas
Roessler · Personal soap box at &lt;http://log.does-not-exist.org/&gt;.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>