RE: [dow1-2tf] mission creep (ALL PLEASE READ)

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think that we are better off to keep our language consistent with the
narrow mission of ICANN, as Tim, Milton, and others are suggesting. When you
read the Strategic Plan, you might get the idea that they are responsible
for the Internet, per se. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 2:48 PM
To: 'Tim Ruiz'; 'Milton Mueller'; marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neuman, Jeff
Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] mission creep (ALL PLEASE READ)

I can go either way on this one.  ICANN must always act within its mission
(at least in theory), so I do not see the possible bad effects that could
occur if we left in the word "internet".  After all, it is not our document
that gives ICANN more power, but rather it is derived from their own bylaws.


Like I said, I am fine with keeping the word Internet in there, but I would
be happy to change it as well.

I would like to get this resolved prior to Capetown.

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 2:27 PM
To: 'Milton Mueller'; marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] mission creep


Milton,

>From ICANN's own website:

"As a private-public partnership, ICANN is dedicated to preserving the
operational stability of the Internet; to promoting competition; to
achieving broad representation of global Internet communities; and to
developing policy appropriate to its mission through bottom-up,
consensus-based processes."

This gets to the issue of defining stability and security as I said in my
earlier response.

Tim



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Milton Mueller
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:58 PM
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dow1-2tf] mission creep



>>> Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> 11/24/2004 8:51:55 AM >>>
 
>ICANN's mission involves the security and stability of the Internet. 

I thank Tim for bringing this up. It indicates a slight error in the
statement that needs to be corrected.

ICANN's mission is NOT the security and stability of "the Internet." It
is to coordinate unique identifiers and to ensure stable and secure
operation of unique identifier systems. "Security and stable of unique
identifiers" is not "security and stability of 'the Internet' as a
whole; the latter is a vast undertaking that is way beyond the scope of
ICANN, involving such things as the operation of ISPs and their routing
practices, software installations by the end user, etc.

For that reason, I would propose the following change in wording on p.
2, step 3, part iii: replace "the Internet" at the end of the sentence
with "Internet's unique identifier systems." 

This should be noncontroversial because it simply makes the statement
conform to ICANN's actuall mission as defined in its bylaws. See below

=====

FYI, Here is the mission statement:

"The mission of The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
("ICANN") is to coordinate, at the overall level, the global Internet's
systems of unique identifiers, and in particular to ensure the stable
and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems." 

Article 1:
"1. Coordinates the allocation and assignment of the three sets of
unique identifiers for the Internet, which are

a. Domain names (forming a system referred to as "DNS");

b. Internet protocol ("IP") addresses and autonomous system ("AS")
numbers; and

c. Protocol port and parameter numbers.

2. Coordinates the operation and evolution of the DNS root name server
system.

3. Coordinates policy development reasonably and appropriately related
to these technical functions."