<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2
- To: "'Marc Schneiders'" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:25:14 -0500
- Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, even in the US, we do not consider the "courts" as a "government
agency." :)
Is there a place in the document that you are looking at?
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:35 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2
Stupid question from a non-native English speaking European about
the meaning of a word in the text on conflicts with national privacy
laws:
Is a 'court of law' a 'government agency'?
I would never, ever, include courts under government agencies. And
judges in my country would hang me if I did (and we still had capital
punishment, which we fortunately do not). But if this is normal in US
English, I have no problems. So just for clarification. Thanks.
Marc Schneiders
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|