ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

dow1-2tf


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2

  • To: "'Marc Schneiders'" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:25:14 -0500
  • Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

No, even in the US, we do not consider the "courts" as a "government
agency." :) 

Is there a place in the document that you are looking at?

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:35 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] Last Call on Final Draft of Issues 1 and 2


Stupid question from a non-native English speaking European about
the meaning of a word in the text on conflicts with national privacy
laws:

Is a 'court of law' a 'government agency'?

I would never, ever, include courts under government agencies. And
judges in my country would hang me if I did (and we still had capital
punishment, which we fortunately do not). But if this is normal in US
English, I have no problems. So just for clarification. Thanks.

Marc Schneiders





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>