RE: [dow1-2tf] FW: WSJ.com - New Services Are Making It Easier To Hide Who Is Behind Web Sites
- To: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] FW: WSJ.com - New Services Are Making It Easier To Hide Who Is Behind Web Sites
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:23:09 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: "Steven J. Metalitz IIPA" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>, <dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <DA6F8AFB015C544AB4385B5DEBDE1FBB0C2440@mail.enom.com>
- Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, I should have said: credit card details, which the registrar or
its reseller must have.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, at 17:33 [=GMT-0700], Paul Stahura wrote:
> Registrars do not always have the credit card details, and many, in fact
> seldom do. This is because a high volume of names are often sold via a
> reseller (such as Yahoo or MSN) to the registrant.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:09 PM
> To: Steven J. Metalitz IIPA
> Cc: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [dow1-2tf] FW: WSJ.com - New Services Are Making It Easier To
> Hide Who Is Behind Web Sites
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, at 11:57 [=GMT-0400], Steven J. Metalitz IIPA wrote:
> > Perhaps TF participants will have more luck with this link......
> Thanks, Steve, it worked.
> One issue the article, which I find quite balanced, doesn't raise, is
> that those who really try to evade the law, will simply put in fake
> data, and not use cloaking services. Much safer.
> Of course such registrants can always be found over the credit card
> details, which the registar must have.
> So what is the real problem if criminal offenses are what we are
> talking about?