<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams
- From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:23:37 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHSSWF72UCeqqUdJ06hUA+Rcl8KwA==
- Thread-topic: FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams
- User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.0.161115
Dear all,
As the GNSO Council continues to discuss its processes for selecting GNSO
representatives to the various Bylaws-mandated Review Teams, you may be
interested in the guidelines that were recently adopted by the ccNSO concerning
its selection process. Highlights include a two-week nomination period
following a Call for Volunteers, different processes that apply where 3 or
fewer nominations are received versus 4 or more, recusal by a Council member if
he/she is a nominee, and a suggested path to follow if there are additional
vacancies in any particular Review Team to be filled by agreement amongst the
SO/ACs.
The full set of ccNSO guidelines can be found here:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/62398942/Item%207%20-%207%20Nov%202016%20ccNSO%20Guideline%20Appointment%20Specific%20Review%20Teams.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1478165860000&api=v2.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|