ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams
  • From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:23:37 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHSSWF72UCeqqUdJ06hUA+Rcl8KwA==
  • Thread-topic: FOR INFORMATION/CONSIDERATION - ccNSO Selection Process for Future Review Teams
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.0.161115

Dear all,

As the GNSO Council continues to discuss its processes for selecting GNSO 
representatives to the various Bylaws-mandated Review Teams, you may be 
interested in the guidelines that were recently adopted by the ccNSO concerning 
its selection process. Highlights include a two-week nomination period 
following a Call for Volunteers, different processes that apply where 3 or 
fewer nominations are received versus 4 or more, recusal by a Council member if 
he/she is a nominee, and a suggested path to follow if there are additional 
vacancies in any particular Review Team to be filled by agreement amongst the 
SO/ACs.

The full set of ccNSO guidelines can be found here: 
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/62398942/Item%207%20-%207%20Nov%202016%20ccNSO%20Guideline%20Appointment%20Specific%20Review%20Teams.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1478165860000&api=v2.

Thanks and cheers
Mary




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>