ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:13:13 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=+GM94wyZWWGgDowZrd3shDYeDuU7W9J4Fwmp9XU9U1Q=; b=sXdRe2fLY7mc9Pe6uVGfmW0WzxCZ2Hy8+Fjumn5pV0M9/x+fWwcPbqPLEWbGgh6HQCkYLh6HvKet/0AjVhNT632veXf9+gjQV/JTsxOfeM0GNN6bfXxRD8hTouV6DpC9idX+lPFtWg7RI/h5tafyUlwlx+FSBsTJETKFvN36DPE=
  • In-reply-to: <856f91eb128e499385896f59cdd6744c@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <2151ccd531a4491bbea175056a8ed4fc@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <152aabfa-a2e9-45d8-b3c5-06ca00fa05d5@EXHUB2010-1.campus.MCGILL.CA> <b58880b128d944f0b3c557b92448e3e7@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <949446ED-97A1-4F1B-9D35-08AF1158B01C@disspain.uk> <7959d934cce14026a80afd4f6f801827@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <D7000334-56D9-4A7D-94FC-AE7B6063BAAB@disspain.uk> <75e9833b7153461285664e04a8834d94@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <3782515e-03bc-4760-9038-28468ef1ee0f@EXHUB2010-3.campus.MCGILL.CA> <b316041681ee446da4d100f7d04f155a@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <856f91eb128e499385896f59cdd6744c@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
  • Thread-index: AdIxUApOWXkITPEbQkSa2XeyJNRKQwAGFKQ1AN5atYAAADKEAAAAN5WAAAAK4QAAAP3qAAA0UWFpAB87mYACkhGHAABH3ZIA
  • Thread-topic: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910

Council colleagues –

See message below, and attached document from Margie.  I know some (Susan?) 
have raised concerns with the draft Limited Scope for RDS Review, but do we 
think it is possible for us to gather and submit our feedback by 1 DEC?
Thanks—
J.

From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 19:55
Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

Dear All,

I understand from conversations in Hyderabad that you may need additional time 
to provide feedback from your SO/AC on the RDS Review Limited Scope Proposal.

May I suggest a December 1st deadline for feedback?

All the best,

Margie

_______
Margie Milam
Vice President
MSSI
ICANN
________


From: Margie Milam
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

Dear All-

Here is a clean version of the Limited Scope Proposal, noting the change below.

All the best,
Margie

From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:28 PM
To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>; Chris Disspain <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Schneider 
<Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Katrina Sataki <katrina@xxxxxx>; James M. 
Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; louie@xxxxxxxxx; Patrik Fältström 
<patrik@xxxxxxxxxx>; tsinha@xxxxxxx; bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rinalia 
Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx>; Goran Marby 
<goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx>; Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; Cyrus Namazi 
<cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx>; David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>; Theresa 
Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>; Samantha Eisner 
<Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx>; Erika Randall <erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx>; Pamela 
Smith <pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx>; Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx>; 
Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

For those trying to understand the proposal, note that there is an extraneous 
"not" in the 4th sub-bullet of Suggested Approach. It should read "... and to 
the extent that it is found to be insufficient or inaccurate...". Or 
alternately, it could read "... and to the extent that it is found to not be 
sufficient or accurate...".

Alan

At 02/11/2016 05:00 AM, Margie Milam wrote:


Hi Chris & All-

It seems the next step would be to determine the level of consensus to this 
draft proposal among the SO/AC leaders.   Please kindly use the attached 
document, discuss it with your SO/AC, and reply by November 9th if there are 
any objections to moving forward with this proposal.

All the best,

Margie Milam

From: Chris Disspain [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

Sorry for not being clear. I mean what do we now need to do so we start to take 
the next steps?



Cheers,



Chris

On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:30, Margie Milam 
<Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

Hi Chris-

The next steps are listed in the Proposal:
•             Circulate proposal to SO/AC leadership to socialize with their 
respective SO/ACs
• ;            Discuss with Community in Hyderabad at the WHOIS High Interest 
Topic Session
•             SO/AC leadership to issue a public statement or a letter to ICANN 
CEO and Board Chair that explains why limited scope is appropriate and 
articulates that they have broad support of the ICANN community
•             Call for Volunteers to note limited scope & unique expertise 
sought
•             Reach out to the previous Review Team members and members of the 
Expert Working Group on Registration Directory Services,  and encourage them to 
consider applying for the narrow scoped RDS Review Team
•             Propose a Charter for the RDS Review Team to adopt that tracks 
the limited Scope

All the best,

Margie



From: Chris Disspain [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:55 PM
To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> >
Cc: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
>; Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oscar@xxxxxxxxxx>>; Thomas 
Schneider < 
Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
Katrina Sataki <katrina@xxxxxx<mailto:katrina@xxxxxx>>; James M. Bladel 
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
louie@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:louie@xxxxxxxxx>; Patrik Fältström 
<patrik@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:patrik@xxxxxxxxxx>>; 
tsinha@xxxxxxx<mailto:tsinha@xxxxxxx>; 
bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx>>; Goran Marby 
<goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx>>; Jamie Hedlund 
<jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >; Cyrus Namazi 
<cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx> >; David Olive 
<david.olive@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>; Theresa Swinehart < 
theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>>; Samantha 
Eisner < Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx>>; Erika 
Randall <erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx> >; Pamela 
Smith <pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx> >; Karen Mulberry 
<karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx> >; Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

OK…¦.

What are our next steps please Margie?

Cheers,

Chris

On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:19, Margie Milam 
<Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

Dear All-

Please see the attached document, which includes Alan’s revision.

Thanks,
Margie

From: Alan Greenberg [ mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 3:42 AM
To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> >; 
chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Oscar A. Robles-Garay 
<oscar@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oscar@xxxxxxxxxx>>; Thomas Schneider < 
Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
Katrina Sataki <katrina@xxxxxx<mailto:katrina@xxxxxx>>; 
jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
louie@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:louie@xxxxxxxxx>; Patrik Fältström 
<patrik@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:patrik@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>;tsinha@xxxxxxx<mailto:tsinha@xxxxxxx>; 
bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx>>; Goran Marby 
<goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx>>; Chris Disspain 
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >; 
Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx> >; David 
Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>; Theresa Swinehart 
< theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>>; Samantha 
Eisner < Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx>>; Erika 
Randall <erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx> >; Pamela 
Smith <pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx> >; Karen Mulberry 
<karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx> >; Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review

One more thought. It are some items which were recommended but were rejected 
(or more likely transformed into some other form), so I would add one more 
option to the 2nd bullet. Specifically:
o       Requesting the ICANN organization to do a "self-assessment" reporting 
on a) the extent to which each recommendation was followed and/or implemented; 
b) the effectiveness in addressing the issues identified by the First WHOIS 
Review Team; and c) the need for additional implementation.
Alan
At 28/10/2016 03:37 PM, Margie Milam wrote:




Dear All,

Please find attached the draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review.  As I 
did not receive any suggested revisions, it is unchanged from the document 
circulated earlier.

Safe travels & see you in India!

Margie

From: Margie Milam
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:03 PM
To: 'chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' 
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 'Oscar A. Robles-Garay' 
<oscar@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:oscar@xxxxxxxxxx>>; 'Thomas Schneider' < 
Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
'Katrina Sataki' <katrina@xxxxxx<mailto:katrina@xxxxxx>>; 
'jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>' 
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
'louie@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:louie@xxxxxxxxx>' 
<louie@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:louie@xxxxxxxxx>>; 
'alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>' 
<alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> >; 'Patrik 
Fältström' <patrik@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:patrik@xxxxxxxxxx>>; 
'tsinha@xxxxxxx<mailto:tsinha@xxxxxxx>' 
<tsinha@xxxxxxx<mailto:tsinha@xxxxxxx>>; 
'bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>' 
<bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ' 
cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' < 
cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>;erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ' 
markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' < 
markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:markus.kummer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; ' 
steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' < 
steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; ' 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' 
< 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < 
rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@xxxxxxxxx>>; Goran Marby 
<goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:goran.marby@xxxxxxxxx>>; 'Chris Disspain' 
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: 'Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx>' 
<Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx> >; Lauren Allison 
<lauren.allison@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lauren.allison@xxxxxxxxx> >; Jamie Hedlund 
<jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >; Cyrus Namazi 
<cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:cyrus.namazi@xxxxxxxxx> >; David Olive 
<david.olive@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>; Theresa Swinehart < 
theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>>; Samantha 
Eisner < Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx>>; Erika 
Randall <erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:erika.randall@xxxxxxxxx> >; Pamela 
Smith <pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:pamela.smith@xxxxxxxxx> >; Karen Mulberry 
<karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:karen.mulberry@xxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: RE: Request to SO/AC Leadership from Chris Disspain

Dear All,

I would like to provide you an update on the next steps for the Registration 
Directory Services Review (WHOIS-2), following the Oct 13th telephone call:

·         As discussed, Alan Greenberg and I developed the attached strawman 
proposal for a limited scope Registration Directory Services Review.
·         Please kindly review the attached proposal, and provide any 
initial comments by the close of business on Thursday Oct 27th, and a revised 
version will be circulated on Friday Oct 28th.
·         Any additional comments on your SO/AC’s perspective on this to 
topic can be shared at the High Interest Topic Session on WHOIS in Hyderabad on 
Sat, November 5th
·         Also, please note we plan to publish the Call for Volunteers for 
the RDS Review on Friday Oct 28th.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best Personal Regards,

Margie

_________

Margie Milam
Vice President-
Multistakeholder Strategy &
Strategic Initiatives
_________


Content-Type: 
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
         name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx"
Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx
Content-Disposition: attachment;
         filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx"; 
size=21322;
         creation-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:11:17 GMT";
         modification-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:54:25 GMT"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         
1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:z7ZJzyqUUhIV+rYbm7ztXWmOEEIDUYAHsz5qugLtCKtYQygfhnnl7ZjXQLIS1yiJ0LlMsLOv78pLzHgtMNiID0ZtC41jLF2QHIcLuWyey8kE9RF/VT66y4CAXpAekS8UPRfQUw9mztYMiqHq/N6aKk3oqE/RccLM4DXEbPCPTvu+B63ymxG1sBnYwhZhlP/9dwWjaLPrnexlkKb2rXrrqrLkUga9rLSjKVHP8muYXEL/RIhVBL6HI9ZE9JjxS6OdSGbfaR3oW4lHBcgi40bkNrnfBZ/AgSHBe7v9Z8PRAqGOOFtlRkFkVWjfLUBKZlvOxAel/ywgTqVsAA7TdUlocnWbswVevP+4tHssI3+gAZsBXsj5OXmhCagDwnevkRtNuO7bwHbKFX4TYpD+cXltc0A2SbIXPMf97jtNZv9HO48m05uhm6QLRonkxCVMR1ue
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
         ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);
<Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx>

Content-Type: 
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
         name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx"
Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx
Content-Disposition: attachment;
         filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx";
         size=21060; creation-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:12:57 GMT";
         modification-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:13:07 GMT"
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
         
1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:XkUawjzAAaJU4j1DR3X1unwaSCiumewwnDInu8vzdDiC8jqg0dUg0X9sa2HVdmRY5OT/AE2CmmnyZWG1uMqEUWhiAFW0iOPKB6XAUpvnSOe2mrgLJ8yp5KY0K+DBjA8RxtJQiJ1mZeYG/LZKh03Bunhh8CmvHFYesEGOaORs0KLmKIiA4m5//+YuJSdDAAswMFBHovg1RTPeH+qqJh5wdo8IDd5q+xQJ47/kleB1iCmv02mItqjWr2gaI7yLkheIj93sXoeeYz61fitLAis5+rVhvZjlOLEUubSqCaqabIZbAmPL8DDQcEjJon/HKKAOQSvzd65o3W3UcgPaj0AcuvErjxMNzg4KaIM6PRyNkFduCOhItAVFVqUfIwQ3mSXyKpR53o9E6pHLQDhhSB/ciwgtUzFVF5fclTf6nB7zmS/FaGQBgbECT6ATbUyF0htN
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
         ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);

Attachment: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v4-4-11-16.pdf
Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v4-4-11-16.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>