<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] AMENDMENT - Acceptance of the Report from the Bylaws Drafting Team
All,
I herewith withdraw the amendment submitted on behalf of the CSG.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
> Am 07.11.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Stephanie Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Are we going to have time to discuss this draft? I have a couple of issues
> with it....
> It is a great pity that the french meeting carried on 15 minutes past its
> allotted time and removed the possiblity for an informal discussion on this.
>
> Stephanie
>> On 2016-11-07 00:23, James M. Bladel wrote:
>> Councilors –
>>
>> Attached and copied below, please find a proposed amendment to my earlier
>> motion referenced above, in accordance with our discussions during last
>> night’s working session.
>>
>> As a seconder, I would ask Rubens Kuhl to confirm whether he takes these
>> changes as friendly.
>> Thank you,
>> J
>>
>>
>> 1. MOTION – Acceptance of the Report from the GNSO Bylaws
>> Implementation Drafting Team and next steps
>> (Motion deferred to 7 November 2016 from 13 October 2016)
>> Made by: James Bladel
>> Seconded by: Rubens Kuhl
>>
>> WHEREAS:
>> 1. On 30 June 2016 the GNSO Council approved the creation of a
>> Drafting Team (DT) that was to work with ICANN staff to “fully identify all
>> the new or additional rights and responsibilities that the GNSO has under
>> the revised Bylaws, including but not limited to participation of the GNSO
>> within the Empowered Community, and to develop new or modified structures
>> and procedures (as necessary) to fully implement these new or additional
>> rights and responsibilities”;
>> 2. In creating the DT, the GNSO Council requested that the DT provide
>> the GNSO Council with an implementation plan “which will have the consensus
>> of the Drafting Team, including any recommendations for needed further
>> changes to ICANN Bylaws and/or GNSO Operating Procedures to enable effective
>> GNSO participation in ICANN activities under the revised ICANN Bylaws, not
>> later than 30 September 2016”;
>> 3. During the course of the DT’s work, strongly divergent views were
>> expressed on the role of the GNSO Council in the Empowered Community,
>> leading to the production of a Final Report which included a minority
>> report; and
>> 4. The DT submitted its Final Report to the GNSO Council on 12 October
>> 2016
>> (https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/bylaws-drafting-team-final-report-12oct16-en.pdf).
>> The GNSO Council has reviewed the DT’s report.
>>
>> RESOLVED:
>>
>> 1. The GNSO Council accepts the recommendations in the DT’s report as
>> submitted.
>> 2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN Policy Staff to draft proposed
>> language for any necessary modifications or additions to the GNSO Operating
>> Procedures and, if applicable, those parts of the ICANN Bylaws pertaining to
>> the GNSO. The GNSO Council requests that ICANN Legal evaluate whether the
>> proposed modifications are consistent with the post-transition Bylaws and
>> report their findings to the GNSO Council.
>> 3. The GNSO Council requests that members of the DT make themselves
>> available for consultation by ICANN Policy Staff as needed.
>> 4. In acknowledgement of the divergent views within the DT, the GNSO
>> Council directs ICANN Policy Staff to post the DT Final Report, including
>> the minority report, and all proposed modifications or new procedures for
>> public comment for no less than 40 days. The GNSO Council expects that any
>> comments received will be given meaningful consideration.
>> 5. As resolved previously, the GNSO Council intends to subject the
>> adoption of the proposed modifications to existing procedures and/or ICANN
>> Bylaws to a GNSO Supermajority vote.
>> 6. The GNSO Council thanks the DT for its collaborative effort,
>> especially in view the limited time frame available to the DT.
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|