Re: [council] GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics

["Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <crg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 on the trilateral idea Donna. Particularly if a short and poignant 
(1-2 slide) introduction to those issues can be made to the meeting. GAC 
meetings take longest to warm up, using up to 20% of the time available.
The drawback may be of course is again logistics: (a) the adequate size 
of the room and (b) adequate schedule, as the other bilateral meetings 
would have to be back to back (or front to front) to the joint one (1. 
GAC-Board, 2. GAC-Board-GNSO, 3. GAC -GNSO or something like that.
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 26 Oct 2016, at 17:31, Austin, Donna wrote:

> James, Paul, all
>
> A couple of suggestions for consideration, that I think are somewhat 
> linked to the questions we received from the Board.
> How do we make better use of our time at ICANN meetings:
> 1) in terms of scheduling; and
> 2) to provide more opportunities for Board/GAC/GNSO Council trilateral 
> discussions on substantive topics of common interest.
> There should be a better process for developing the ICANN schedule and 
> there certainly should be predictability in terms of Council meetings 
> with the ICANN Board, ICANN CEO, the GAC and others. If we could agree 
> on a standard schedule for meetings A & C, that may help relieve some 
> of the angst that we and staff have to endure each time.
> On the second point, I really think we would benefit from organized 
> and sometimes moderated trilateral discussions, rather than the Board 
> and GAC/ the Council and the Board/ and the GAC and the Council having 
> separate discussions on the same subject. The continuous back and 
> forth on the IGO acronym and Red Cross issues are a case in point. 
> Perhaps this could have been circumvented if there had been an 
> opportunity for open communication across the three groups.
> Thanks for considering.
>
> Donna
>
> Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc.
> Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
> Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: 
> donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for 
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential 
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient 
> you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> notify me immediately and delete the original message.
> Follow Neustar:   [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>   
> [cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>   
> [cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:33 AM
> To: 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>; 'James M. Bladel' 
> <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'GNSO Council List' <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
>
> Thanks Marika.
>
> I think what the Board has asked are the very questions that needed to 
> be asked.  How will we decide who gets to speak at the Board/Council 
> session?  I have (unsurprisingly) thoughts to share and would like to 
> participate.
> Best,
> Paul
>
> PS: Apologies if this has already been answered in an earlier email.  
> I am a bit behind in my correspondence.
> From: 
> owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:58 AM
> To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; 
> GNSO Council List 
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
>
> Reminder – the deadline for submission of topics for the joint 
> meeting with the Board is today (Wednesday 26 October)!
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: 
> <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
> behalf of "James M. Bladel" 
> <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Friday, October 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM
> To: GNSO Council List 
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
>
> Councilors –
>
> Below, please see a note from Board support, including 2 questions the 
> Board would like to raise with us during our joint meeting in 
> Hyderabad.
> Additionally, please recall my “Call for Topics” from last week, 
> as the agenda for our joint meetings needs to be finalized by this 
> Wednesday (26 OCT).    For your convenience, Staff has prepared a 
> centralized Wiki page (below) with the Draft Agendas for all joint 
> sessions.  Some of these are based on previous meetings, so please 
> suggest any edits or changes you’d like to see in India.
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62399849[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D62399849&d=DQMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=mSLKY6jrbFDpsgA48d3eey3RjCShJfdyNTvSeSVs2ck&s=9WukPQwvG1hAtmLdKAFzB4WfzWPMoxgmzUHXuPDTAXA&e=>
> Thank you,
> J.
>
> From: Vinciane Koenigsfeld 
> <vinciane.koenigsfeld@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 10:48
> To: "jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>" 
> <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx>>, Marika 
> Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: GNSO Meeting with the Board : Topics
>
> Dear James,
>
> We are looking forward to seeing you in Hyderabad!
>
> As you know, over the years, the Board has heard from many Groups on 
> the need to make the interaction between the Board and 
> Constituency/Stakeholder/Advisory Groups at ICANN Public Meetings more 
> effective for both the Groups and the Board.
> To do this, Board Operations collects, ahead of the Meeting, the 
> questions that each Group would like to bring to the Board.
> We would appreciate receiving the questions/topics that GNSO might 
> want to discuss with the Board during the meeting currently scheduled 
> on Monday 7 November. The deadline for submission of these topics is 
> Wednesday 26 October.
> We are as well taking this opportunity to share with you the Board's 
> questions to your Group, for discussion during this meeting.
> QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD :
>
> 1.      What do we (Board and ICANN organization) have to do to make 
> the transition work for you?
> 2.      What do we (Board, ICANN organization and community) need to 
> do to advance trust and confidence in what we do?
> Best,
>
> The Board Ops team