RE: [council] [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council

["Paul McGrady" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

Here is the long awaited IPC response (sorry it took so long to herd the cats):

________________________________________

“The IPC believes that all of the following reviews should be completed prior 
to the opening of the next new gTLD application window:

Rights Protection Mechanism Phase 1
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
SSR Review
CCT Review

Several in our number also believe that  Rights Protection Mechanism Phase 2 
should be completed prior to the next round.  Some IPC members also believe 
there are elements of WS2 which should be completed first."
_____________________________________________

I'm looking forward to further discussion on the list and in our next call.

Best,
Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Volker Greimann
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:12 AM
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>; Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council List 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James 
Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council


I am with Rubens on this. The question is not if but how and when there will be 
a next round. Policy decisions regarding the last round all have the assumption 
that there shall be a next round baked into them. If we want to change that or 
have a discussion whether or not there should be a next round, we first need to 
change all those prior policy decisions.

Even the subsequent rounds WG currently ongoing is not focussed on considering 
the IF but rather on the question of HOW. There are studies that have to happen 
before there can be a next round, and there will likely be changes from how the 
last round was handled based on the learnings of that round, but the community 
has committed to this process.

Volker



Am 21.09.2016 um 20:38 schrieb Rubens Kuhl:
>
>> Em 21 de set de 2016, à(s) 14:48:000, Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx> 
>> escreveu:
>>
>>
>> Wolf-Ulrich,
>>
>>> 1.    Both the letter from the Board and the letter from the GNSO
>>> Council seem to start with the assumption that there will 
>>> necessarily be a subsequent round of the new gTLD program. The ISPCP 
>>> constituency hopes that a full discussion about whether or not to 
>>> have a further round is had by the community long before work is 
>>> done on building a new application process. It seems essential that 
>>> the marketplace and technical reviews are complete and considered by 
>>> the community. These need to be part of the foundation of any 
>>> discussion of whether or not to proceed with subsequent rounds of new gTLD 
>>> applications.
>> Indeed. I am concerned about the way a lot of people seem to assume a 
>> subsequent round will happen. I feel we have to wait for the results 
>> of the reviews before making up our minds.
>
> The original policy actually defined that it wouldn't be a one-time event or 
> an experimental process... it was defined as recurring and in rounds. The 
> implementation foresaw a new round happening one year after the 2012-round, 
> and it's possible that some parties factored that into their decision to 
> apply or not...
>
> ... whether this was wise or not is up for discussion in two workgroups and 
> two review efforts (besides ones already completed. In the particular 
> question "should new subsequent procedures happen", consensus has already 
> been achieved on them to happen, so in this case both existing policy and 
> prospective policy are on the same page.
>
>
>
>
>
> Rubens
>
>

--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / 
www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen 
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder 
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht 
nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder 
telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / 
www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.