<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains
- To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:03:11 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdICxrVMI2+5d/mtTwC1Brr6NfJBqw==
- Thread-topic: CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains
Council Colleagues:
It appears that I have incorrectly attributed the authorship of the referenced
article to Prof. Mueller, who posts the great majority of blog posts at the
website. The author of this particular article is Farzaneh Badii. I apologize
for any confusion my misattribution may have caused.
Regards, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Phil Corwin
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 7:19 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Two Letter gTLD Domains
Council colleagues:
Over the weekend Milton Mueller posted a rather provocative blog at
http://www.internetgovernance.org/2016/08/26/another-government-land-grab-in-the-name-space/
, concerning the just-closed comment period on Proposed Measures for
Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding
Country Codes (at
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-measures-two-char-2016-07-08-en).
It prompted me to review the filed comments, and I noted that the NCSG, IPC,
and registry SG all came out against aspects of the staff proposal that
concerns Prof. Mueller.
While this item is not on our agenda for the September 1st call, I would hope
that we can at least begin a preliminary discussion during the concluding AOB
section. I would like to better understand the historic context for the current
proposal. Beyond the specifics of the proposal, my more general concern is that
ICANN may be moving to implement a general policy for gTLDs that originates
from ICANN staff rather than a PDP, and that apparently there is not even GAC
Consensus Advice to which the proposal is responding.
Thanks and best regards,
Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12863 - Release Date: 08/23/16
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|