Re: [council] For your review - latest version of GNSO Review of GAC Communique
Thank you for the extra time. Some comments on the new text.Additionally, listening to the feedback call between the GAC and Board shows that there is still a lot to do ( maybe in the GAC-GNSO coordination group) to clarify the relations between the GAC-BOARD-GNSO, particularly of the role of individual GAC members participation in PDPs, as some Councillors have suggested. In the case of the AoC Review Teams, it is my understanding that the GAC member elected to the Team is a full GAC rep, or not? Wish you all a nice weekend Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 21 Jul 2016, at 17:20, Marika Konings wrote: Dear All,As discussed during today’s meeting, please find attached the latest version of the GNSO Review of the GAC Communique. On page 7 you will find the addition suggested by James in bold. Please review this document and share any comments and/or edits you may have by Wednesday 27 July at the latest.Thanks, Marika Marika KoningsSenior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)Email: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSOFind out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. Attachment:
GNSO Review of GAC Communique - Helsinki - FINAL 21 July 2016 comments crg.pages
|