Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

["WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I’m not sure why there is uncertainty.

This motion is related to the GNSO future. NCAs – as members of the council – 
are part of the GNSO. They should undoubtedly given the opportunity to take 
part in this effort – either being appointed themselves or appoint others.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Johan Helsingius 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:12 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment

Heather,
 
> As I see it, only the houseless NCA falls into this category

Not sure - a house is, as I see it, neither a constituency or a stakeholder 
group,
as the whole concept of "houses" is, at least the way I see it, basically just a
voting construct. But, again, I could be very wrong. And anyway, my spell
checker keeps insisting "houseless" should be spelled "horseless".

> but I assume any SG or C could nominate someone of their choosing
> (not necessarily someone from within the SG/C).

I guess so, yes - but (and now we are really getting into minor details, but...)
can a NCA nominate anyone?
   
    Julf