<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] MOTION - To extend the term of the current GNSO Liaison to the GAC
- To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] MOTION - To extend the term of the current GNSO Liaison to the GAC
- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:52:39 +0200
- Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=key-systems.net; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from :from:references:to:subject:subject; s=dkim; t=1466509951; x= 1467373952; bh=KITQHleXt20jQXGdTb7P/5/7+Lw2abiimDYRTqXlzoA=; b=H hFM8nRrGfl1hKIXa7XsfOU7MmaF/m9HRc9L/wUcMkM0bZBXeNlInk0gPI+iiSpwU AYrbwSQ1cLmqa9bTo6wDB8CU0H0QW8aGhOdl1SMd03XvQ8t52yEnyOiBcMakiwB1 ysOk510TJMSj+K+PoNaQyTsGj0rVpXJnXwEUFkUAC4=
- In-reply-to: <0E8A13881A6B4301BF7C531B42382858@WUKPC>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D38DB801.C6FFA%jbladel@godaddy.com> <00d501d1cb3b$af0d04b0$0d270e10$@paulmcgrady.com> <199E9C8D-0979-4BDC-A156-DD19F0A85BDB@godaddy.com> <EF5FCC7E-33AA-4B6F-9D1F-57C143F3A0FF@paulmcgrady.com> <0E8A13881A6B4301BF7C531B42382858@WUKPC>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
I support this wording. It is sufficiently neutral and makes neither
positive nor negative assumptions about previous applications.
Volker
Am 21.06.2016 um 13:35 schrieb WUKnoben:
Hi Paul,
I'm with you that WHEREAS 2 as originally suggested should be
improved. However expressing or describing hopes in a motion seems to
bring in some subjectivity which is difficult to assess. So I wonder
whether this could be acceptable:
2. The subsequent call for volunteers resulted in the decision to
extend the selection process.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Paul McGrady
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:28 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] MOTION - To extend the term of the current GNSO
Liaison to the GAC
Thanks James. How about we strike it as written, and just say "whereas
the volume of responses to the request for applications for the role
was less robust than hoped for."
Best,
Paul
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 20, 2016, at 8:50 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Paul -
You are correct, "incomplete" is probably not the best word. The
intention was to leave the door open for the lone application
received to be resubmitted.
I'm fine if we strike "incomplete", or even the entirety of WHEREAS 2.
Thank you,
J.
____________
James Bladel
On Jun 20, 2016, at 16:35, Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi James,
I am Ok with this, except I don't understand WHEREAS 2. What
element of the
application wasn't completed? I thought from all that back and
forth that
the reason to not move forward with the one candidate we had was
that there
was only 1 applicant and, in the opinion of some, he didn't fit the
bill.
This motion reads as if there was an application form that didn't
have all
the checkmarks checked. Can you please elaborate on what is meant by
"incomplete"? Thanks in advance.
Best,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:11 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] MOTION - To extend the term of the current GNSO
Liaison
to the GAC
Councilors -
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|