<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] CCWG - Accountability Members, and Work Stream 2
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] CCWG - Accountability Members, and Work Stream 2
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:35:01 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=h05TqWzgttgOrq2IIDZ1HVPrMFkykHbrbHyoToYloGI=; b=nMd3gSRbAsWLXPHIotZsp8sakXvFyXCcidUixqSFQSRV8x4WBEG3UfDRUhYi0tJSSAokQxaiI6FHhHLbe73dGFEfEvaoUIoy/psTkReiGDA+6BaxJLx3BhSv6qO5ygVi+m+Xz0jr9JEm7PWVrkyXymQVgVvo7/0GvAAA6JS4+Og=
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
- Thread-index: AQHRyyrVgrTqntNpq0usznZxlN0svg==
- Thread-topic: [council] CCWG - Accountability Members, and Work Stream 2
- User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.6.150930
Councilors -
Just a note that I have not (yet) seen any responses to this, so please
try have this confirmed today or as soon as possible.
>From the perspective of the RrSG, we put out a call for volunteers to
replace me on CCWG-ACCT Work Stream 2, but there were no takers. As a
result, I will continue to represent the Registrar Member to this group.
Thank you,
J.
On 6/6/16, 14:04 , "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of James M.
Bladel" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>Dear Council Colleagues -
>
>
>At the establishment of the CCWG-Accountability In November 2014, each
>GNSO Stakeholder Group confirmed a member to join this CCWG, in addition
>to the GNSO appointed co-chair (Thomas Rickert), the members are/were:
>Becky Burr, Steve DelBianco, Robin Gross, and myself. Now, the
>CCWG-Accountability is transitioning from Work Stream 1 (WS1) items
>associated with the IANA transition, and beginning work on Work Stream 2
>(WS2). This is therefore an appropriate opportunity to ask each
>Stakeholder Group to re-confirm that its member selection for this CCWG.
>
>There are two questions at hand for each SG: Will the current GNSO
>appointed member continue to serve through Work Stream 2? If not, who
>will assume this role beginning in Helsinki and going forward? From my
>own view, I do not plan to continue as a member, and plan to ask the RrSG
>to find a replacement. Other members may have similar plans. Finally,
>once we have confirmed or re-confirmed the slate CCWG members, we might
>also take this opportunity to discuss the Council¹s expectations of its
>appointed members, if any.
>
>Please coordinate with your respective ExComs and report back to the
>Council with either (a) re-confirmation of your SG's current CCWG-ACCT
>member or (b) the name and affiliation of their replacement for WS2. We
>need this information in advance of Helsinki, so please respond on the
>list by 20 JUN 2016.
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>
>
>J.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|