ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] International Registration Data (IRD) - Expert WG Report and Proposed Council Actions

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] International Registration Data (IRD) - Expert WG Report and Proposed Council Actions
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:19:27 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RKmaqFLAouRDnC3v2C9pOpzDAp3+gilfBcpBaCma+2o=; b=VXW8xJwcq/tiqv382of/LgK7oCNTfiGuUho9/u4pyvakazMC/R8A0AYW8cnVDLe/U3vxlkj7f++H0yzXCNEnpH8LYrTusyKpuULqXz/zntUjyACtOsE4GJTmQPwS1WtG+6mm4RYAX4+7wKeVJyX4UGpmyJUtG3V4KWk9Sy6/b0Q=
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
  • Thread-index: AQHRykZZWDyrUQrN7kW3FaHWUvENUQ==
  • Thread-topic: International Registration Data (IRD) - Expert WG Report and Proposed Council Actions
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.6.150930

Council Colleagues -

Last month we received a letter (attached) from the ICANN Board, requesting 
that the GNSO Council analyze the Final Report from the 2012 WHOIS Expert 
Working Group for policy implications (IRD Final 
Report<https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/ird-expert-wg-final-23sep15-en.pdf>),
 and forward this report and our concerns to the appropriate PDP working 
groups, including the Next Generation RDS PDP working group at a minimum.

To move this task forward, here are the steps I propose:

  1.  That the Council, forward the IRD Final Report to the RDS PDP chairs, 
with the request that this PDP WG consider these recommendations within the 
context of that policy development work.  And that they report to us (via their 
Council Liaison) any elements of the IRD Recommendations that they believe to 
be incompatible with their Charter, or beyond the scope of a GNSO PDP,  and
  2.  That the Council also forward the IRD Final Report to the former chairs 
of the recently-completed Translation & Transliteration Working Group, with the 
request that they (along with support from Policy Staff) analyze the IRD 
Recommendations against the adopted Recommendations of their PDP (see 
Staff-prepared table, attached).  And that they report back to the Council with 
their assessment of whether or not these recommendations were adequately 
covered by the PDP, or if there are any omissions or incompatibilities, and
  3.  That we reply to the letter from Steve & the Board, acknowledge receipt 
of this request, and inform them of actions taken.

I'd welcome any additional thoughts on this topic, or the proposed path 
forward.  This is an extraordinarily complex topic, with numerous dependencies 
and moving parts, so please don't hesitate to raise any questions or concerns.


Thank you,

J.
________________________________
James Bladel


Attachment: 2016-05-11-Steve-Crocker-to-James-Bladel-IRD-Board-Review-Request.pdf
Description: 2016-05-11-Steve-Crocker-to-James-Bladel-IRD-Board-Review-Request.pdf

Attachment: TTIRDSyncTable.docx
Description: TTIRDSyncTable.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>