<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] GAC Liaison - Update
Hi James,
I guess until I know who's offer of help we are turning down, I'm not
prepared to agree that we should turn it down. I also don't think there is
any reason not to disclose that information and know if no procedure to not
disclose it. We are not the NomCom. Can you please fully inform us so that
we can decide on how to respond to your request?
Regards,
Paul
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:11 AM
To: Phil Corwin; Paul McGrady; 'GNSO Council List'
Subject: Re: [council] GAC Liaison - Update
Hi Phil & Paul -
We did receive some interest in the role, but significantly less so than
when the Liaison was created two years ago.
Also, none of the applicants had any previous experience with the GNSO
Council or with PDP working groups (chair or participant), which were key
considerations in the selection process. Additionally, we received some
verbal indications of interested candidates, but these were withdrawn prior
to the deadline. (Most likely due to the irregular term, but I also note
Phil's point about the time commitment during ICANN meetings.)
Apologies if this sounds like I'm being coy, but I am attempting to address
your questions without divulging too many details about the applicants,
should they wish to resubmit in the fall.
Hope this helps.
Thanks-
J.
From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 9:08
To: Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Bladel
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] GAC Liaison - Update
I'm inclined to agree with the proposed timetable, but like Paul would like
a bit more data. In particular, does the term "underwhelming" denote no
applications?
Also, it may not just be a timing issue, but the fact that the Liaison has
to commit to spend so much time in GAC meetings when attending an ICANN
meeting in which their primary interest may be in other discussions going on
simultaneously.
Best to all, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul McGrady
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 7:22 AM
To: 'James M. Bladel'; 'GNSO Council List'
Subject: RE: [council] GAC Liaison - Update
Hi James,
Before opining, can we have the full data set? Please let us know who
expressed interest. Thanks!
Best,
Paul
From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 8:38 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] GAC Liaison - Update
Dear Council Colleagues -
Recently we closed the nomination period for candidates interested in being
considered for the role of GNSO Liaison to the GAC. Unfortunately, the
response from the GNSO community was underwhelming. The Vice Chairs and I
believe that this may be at least partly attributable to the timing of the
announcement, as more candidates could be interested in the role if it
coincided with the terms of other elected and appointed positions, which is
the conclusion of the AGM in Hyderabad.
Therefore, with this in mind, I'd like to propose that we postpone the
selection of a new GNSO - GAC Liaison until later in the fall, with the
(rough) timeline listed below. It is expected that the additional time will
generate renewed attention to the role, additional expressions of interest
from prospective candidates, and permanently align the term of this position
with that of other terms, including most Councilors.
Please let me know if you have any concerns or objections to this approach.
On a related note, Mason Cole has graciously agreed to stay on a few extra
months to ensure continuity. Thank you, Mason.
Thanks-
J.
_____
Nominations Accepted for Candidates: 1 OCT 2016
Council Chairs consider candidates and notify first choice 20 OCT
Chairs submit motion to Council by 29 OCT for consideration during Council
meeting on 8 NOV
GAC Leadership notified of new Liaison by 9 NOV
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4568/12262 - Release Date: 05/19/16
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|