<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] ICANN, RySG Propose Amendment to New gTLD Registry Agreement
- To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] ICANN, RySG Propose Amendment to New gTLD Registry Agreement
- From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:42:04 -0300
- Authentication-results: mail.nic.br (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
- Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.br; s=dkim; t=1464730924; bh=29OONkR88eVmhN4xiI8K4JQr9wHoLoE0gJFlWsXvxnI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=f1no21Z+jPQ3S34b+MXF+3nJeCS//alyfBA4kro9nuBhG2rXWxqNQ9SMpggQFtlVD DH4TIILC0AFJrczpyHfmM0Dfc76IAZvf57r0KLm1O10blkftnWO+lxOFwPsKyhdvc3 5amWCEBimlVHp5XoH9ZIJWAHlaUV/gpMvLvgJ5WQ=
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mail.nic.br 473E01C86BE
- In-reply-to: <8E84A14FB84B8141B0E4713BAFF5B84E20F252D6@Exchange.sierracorporation.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1C0EC3A8-0017-4D97-8F47-B0AFD8C15A4F@icann.org> <8E84A14FB84B8141B0E4713BAFF5B84E20F252D6@Exchange.sierracorporation.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Em 31 de mai de 2016, à(s) 17:57:000, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> Question:
>
> I have not yet reviewed the proposed amendments to judge how consequential
> they are.
>
> However, how does this negotiation process between the RySG and ICANN staff
> relate to the work of the Subsequent Procedures WG?
>
Phil,
ICANN usually tries to make its contracts homogeneous, so it's expected that
gTLDs coming from the subsequent procedures to adopt then-current base registry
agreements, which will be the 2014 version with the 2016 changes, probably.
Rubens
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|