Re: [council] Draft Letter to the Board on Red Cross Names & Identifier

["Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <crg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Looks good to me. Don´t know if Phil Corwin wants to add something 
about the recent opinion drafted by the Law expert retained for the RPM.
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 19 May 2016, at 22:22, Mary Wong wrote:

> Dear Councilors,
>
> Following further consultations between the Council chairs and staff 
> on this matter, the chairs would like to provide the attached letter 
> for your final review before it is sent to the ICANN Board. 
> Essentially, this is the version suggested by the RySG (per Donna’s 
> earlier note, below) but with a single revision at the end of the 
> second paragraph, to clarify that the GNSO’s IGO and Red Cross 
> recommendations originated in a single PDP.
> Please indicate any objections or concerns you may have with this 
> proposed final version of the letter to the Board by COB in your time 
> zone on Monday 23 May if at all possible, following which we will 
> transmit the final letter to the Board shortly thereafter on behalf of 
> Donna, Heather, James and the Council.
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
> From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Austin, Donna" 
> <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 05:44
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [council] Draft Letter to the Board on Red Cross Names & 
> Identifier
> James, all
>
> Following on from the discussion on the Council call yesterday about 
> next steps in resolving the issue of permanent protection of certain 
> Red Cross identifiers, the RySG has requested that the letter to the 
> Board be amended to request an update/resolution of the outstanding 
> issues related to the permanent protection of certain Red Cross 
> identifiers and IGO acronyms. These issues have not previously been 
> decoupled and we are concerned that if the Council suggests this as a 
> path forward at this point it may be at the expense of resolving the 
> remaining issues associated with IGO acronyms.
> Proposed amendments to the letter are provided for consideration.
>
> Thanks
>
> Donna
>
> Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc.
> Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
> Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: 
> donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for 
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential 
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient 
> you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> notify me immediately and delete the original message.
> Follow Neustar:   [id:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>   
> [id:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>   
> [id:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]  
> Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.