<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] REMINDER: Meeting B [Policy Forum] Helsinki - topics for discussion
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] REMINDER: Meeting B [Policy Forum] Helsinki - topics for discussion
- From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:55:02 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- In-reply-to: <44780E9C-4BD5-404A-BB20-AB23645BC989@icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <44780E9C-4BD5-404A-BB20-AB23645BC989@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHRkbEKbd1YaDF3RTy7Ly/kuu5FZp+AbO6L
- Thread-topic: [council] REMINDER: Meeting B [Policy Forum] Helsinki - topics for discussion
Dear all,
Following Mary's suggestion could I add that Councillors might also want to
consider discussing the status of the CWG On The Use Of Country And Territory
As Top-Level Domains in Helsinki.
>From a staff perspective it would be a useful addition to the policy
>discussion because by the time of ICANN56 the CWG should have concluded (or be
>near the conclusion) its discussion on 3-character codes as TLDs. The
>diverging views on this matter among CWG members will this make a potentially
>very useful subject for face-to-face discussions, especially because both
>ccNSO and GAC are closely involved in this issue, too.
Carlos and Heather - the GNSO co-chairs of the group - might want to add to
this.
Many thanks and best wishes
Lars
On Apr 8, 2016, at 10:13, Mary Wong
<mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello Donna and everyone,
I hope it’s all right for staff to make a suggestion, in which case I’d like to
make one on behalf of the Cross Community Working Group whose draft Framework
of Principles for Future CWGs is now out for public comment. There seems to be
a high level of interest in the development of a uniform approach to the
formation and operation of future CWGs, including from the ICANN Board (who I
understand may be submitting a public comment to the group). The group is also
targeting Helsinki as the timeframe for completion of its Final Report and
Framework, which hopefully will also mean that subsequent timely adoption of
the final Framework will allow it to be used for the next CWG to be formed.
We realize that the topic is not, strictly speaking, substantive policy, but
given the timing, interest and now the opportunity to convene a cross-community
dialogue on what the final principles ought to be, we thought the GNSO Council
might like to consider this as a topic to suggest.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889
From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on
behalf of "Austin, Donna"
<Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, April 4, 2016 at 16:47
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] REMINDER: Meeting B [Policy Forum] Helsinki - topics for
discussion
It would be really great to get everyone’s input here.
From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March 2016 6:34 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Meeting B [Policy Forum] Helsinki
Last Thursday Volker and I attended a call, hosted by Chris Disspain from the
Board, to start planning for Meeting B (Policy Forum), in Helsinki in June.
As a first step, we have been asked to, by 8 April 2016, identify a list of
issues or topics that the GNSO would be interested in discussing at small or
large cross-community sessions during the Helsinki meeting.
It would seem that as a rough guide the afternoons will be assigned for
cross-community engagement and the mornings will be made available for
independent SO/AC work or bilateral meetings depending on requirements;
however, the schedule will be developed once it is better understood what the
respective requirements of all SOs and ACs.
It is not expected that there will be a public forum, the Board will not meet
with constituencies separately, ie no Constituency Tuesday, and no formal Board
meeting.
As discussed in Marrakech, there was support for the idea that the Policy Forum
be used as an opportunity to progress policy development processes, namely:
· PDP New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
· PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in all gTLDs
· PDP on Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service
The Council could also use some of the time available in Helsinki to discuss
workload prioritisation and working methods, but these are just suggestions.
As we will need to inform Tanzanica King of our topics by 8 April, it would be
useful if we could receive individual contributions by 5 April so that we can
agree a consolidated list to provide to Tanzie on the 8th.
We look forward to hearing from all of you on the issue of topics and issues
you would like discussed in Helsinki.
Thanks
Donna
Donna Austin:Neustar, Inc.
Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
Cell:+1.310.890.9655 Email:
donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message.
Follow Neustar: <image001.png>
Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_neustarinc&d=CwMFAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=n5guD_anJc1lXby6PvNInHEXtqWit8ilP3HdghSSOOk&s=b7ltVtG3R4W8052O5TL_jHosnapu_h0RSoROlGYnwAs&e=>
<image002.png>
LinkedIn<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_5349&d=CwMFAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=n5guD_anJc1lXby6PvNInHEXtqWit8ilP3HdghSSOOk&s=ztvpif6U-TDOWMO06ojKgLC6ivSPXnsqk3T3Mdx7Gc4&e=>
<image003.png>
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_neustar&d=CwMFAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=n5guD_anJc1lXby6PvNInHEXtqWit8ilP3HdghSSOOk&s=KExUCxrnjiHfVgpSxEozQZOb1uLwyIZUhfXlO-L7PXQ&e=>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
<image001.png>
<image002.png>
<image003.png>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|