ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] GNSO Review WP Feasibility&Prioritization Motion

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Review WP Feasibility&Prioritization Motion
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 00:49:26 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: t-online.de; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;t-online.de; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=NoOitxBYCtvlMP52YD1nzQ00aSzN6rrPh8HqFcdhXvI=; b=lfDXanhqV4sJsdcBqsikTgk0FL8sxKM2e94mto+b/MqXBiqPNtKwi4qF2q5sCVfhDOddyjL/b6xtVwXKcqkBV9p3HFzNCrwu1+bvp/P72+EnkOMPNqk9dnsj2EyDpvUpskusB8HIMGNFsTL7E1CTrValaEAqSAx8MDFtLFtabZQ=
  • In-reply-to: <E977D84A32974B978C0E398FAA8890A2@WUKPC>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <E977D84A32974B978C0E398FAA8890A2@WUKPC>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHRgEjApbI1GCXBeEuyxUoRLjvHFJ91npSA
  • Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Review WP Feasibility&Prioritization Motion
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.6.150930
Colleagues -

Thanks, Wolf-Ulrich, for keeping this issue front of mind.

I also hope that everyone has had a chance to initiate discussions of the GNSO 
Work Party report within their SGs and Cs.  As for my SG, I can report that 
Registrars recently put together a team to analyze this work, and give feedback 
to our Councilors (Volker, Jen and myself) in advance of the next Council call.

Additionally, Donna, Heather, and I have worked with Staff to arrange an 
informational webinar to present the GNSO Review Recommendations, and answer 
questions from Councilors.  This webinar is tentatively scheduled for 11 or 12 
APR.  Please keep an eye out for an invitation with details on 
dialing/connecting to this session.

Thank you-

J.




From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 7:27
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] GNSO Review WP Feasibility&Prioritization Motion

Dear council colleagues,

I hope you've returned safely and could take some rest from the Marrakech 
meeting.

I'd like to call to your mind that on the occasion of the public council 
meeting I've withdrawn the motion on the GNSO Review WP 
Feasibility&Prioritization since from the discussion it became obvious that 
more SG/C-internal information exchange was needed before submitting the 
material to the OEC of the Board.

The next council call where the motion could be discussed is scheduled on 14 
April with the motion submission deadline on 04 April. This counts a bit more 
than 2 weeks from now - with the Easter holidays in between. Therefore I would 
highly appreciate you initiating talks in your related SG/C. Please enter any 
question/comment to the list you may have regarding the (see attached)

  *   feasibility assessment and prioritization of the GNSO review WP
  *   draft motion

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>