ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for Volunteers

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for Volunteers
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:18:12 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <F1B444F2D28C4ADFB6112320E5DC7C5C@WUKPC>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D314A1FF.661F1%marika.konings@icann.org> <F1B444F2D28C4ADFB6112320E5DC7C5C@WUKPC>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHRgwwDZNQxWyvio0OECtXeqb5cYZ9j5fyAgAGv8QA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for Volunteers
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
Wolf-Ulrich, the intent of the Consultation Group was that the
representative is reconfirmed in the role each year but I agree that it is
not necessarily clear as currently written. Of course, it is up to the
Council to decide whether to agree with this approach or propose
modifications to the review / renewal process.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Monday 21 March 2016 at 00:31
To:  Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for
Volunteers

Thanks to Marika!
 
I¹ve only a comment regarding review and renewal. Here we should clearly
distinguish between the role of the liaison and the representative filling
the liaison.
³The role is reviewed and reconfirmed by the GNSO Council in its position
every year² is not clear to me. Either we want to confirm the representative
or not. This should be discussed. We could also discuss whether to do this
annually or on a longer cycle.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 1:52 AM
To: mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for
Volunteers
 
Dear All,
 
As requested during the GNSO Council wrap up session in Marrakech, please
find attached the updated call for volunteers for the GNSO Liaison to the
GAC which reflects in redline format the updates that have been made as
recommended by the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group compared to the original call
for volunteers which took place in 2014. Furthermore you will find also
attached the evaluation sheet that was used by the GNSO leadership as part
of the previous selection process and which is expected to be used for this
round as well. 
 
If you have any comments and/or concerns, please feel free to share these
with the mailing list. The idea is that the Council confirms during its next
meeting its intent to convert this pilot project to a permanent role
following which the call for volunteers would be published as Mason Cole,
the current liaison, has indicated that he is not available to continue in
this position beyond the end of his term at the end of June 2016.
 
Best regards,
 
Marika

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>