ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?


Thanks for that very helpful clarification, Mary.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:53 AM
To: Phil Corwin; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Hello again – yes, WG membership is not limited to those who are members of an 
SO, AC, SG or Constituency; the only limitation (such as it is) is that it must 
be a “real person”.

More broadly, the WG Guidelines note that a WG should ideally "mirror the 
diversity and representativeness of the community". The WG Chair(s) have the 
responsibility of continually assessing whether the WG has sufficiently broad 
representation or, conversely, "over-representation to the point of capture”.

Cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 09:49
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Just to clarify, interested persons who are not members of an SO or AC are free 
to volunteer as well, correct?

I expect that this WG may draw interest from individuals in the trademark and 
domain investment communities, as well as other sectors, who do not regularly 
participate in ICANN activities.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 7:39 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Hello Phil and everyone,

We will be setting up the requisite mailing lists and drafting the Call for 
Volunteers this week. As Marika noted, we plan to publish the Call for 
Volunteers well before the 21-day deadline and will be coordinating with Phil 
(as Council liaison and interim WG chair) to hold the first meeting of the WG 
about 3 weeks following that. We currently anticipate publishing the Call for 
Volunteers by the end of this week, which will mean that the first WG meeting 
can take place as early as the week of 11 April.

We hope that interested community members with different types of relevant 
expertise will join the WG. A with all GNSO WGs, however, anyone is free to 
sign up to participate (either as a member or observer) throughout the duration 
of the work as well.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, March 14, 2016 at 17:31
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Ok, thanks again.

So if the call for volunteers is issued in the last week of March, then the 
first WG call should take place in the latter half of April.

Much appreciated


Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:29 PM
To: Phil Corwin; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Looking at recent WGs, the first WG call is typically scheduled 3-4 weeks after 
the launch of the call for volunteers.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday 14 March 2016 at 15:25
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Thanks for that clarification, Marika.

For my own information, once the call does go out by no later than March 30th, 
how much time generally transpires between it and the initial organizational 
meeting of the WG?

Very best,
Philip

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:21 PM
To: Phil Corwin; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Dear Phil, all,

The timeline in the motion related to when the call for volunteers would be 
initiated not the duration of the call for volunteers, i.e. the call for 
volunteers should go out no later than 21 days after the adoption of the 
motion. I do anticipate that the call for volunteers will go out well before 
the 21-day deadline and of course, we’ll make sure that sufficient opportunity 
is provided to interested parties to sign up before the first meeting is 
scheduled.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday 14 March 2016 at 15:08
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] Call for Volunteers for RPM/UDRP WG?

Fellow Councilors and staff:

As GNSO Liaison to and Interim Chair for this new WG, may I inquire when the 
Call for Volunteers will be sent out? In Marrakech we extended the usual 14-day 
period to 21 days, but that was 5 days ago.

This will be a  highly complex 2-pahse PDP that I expect to consume at least 
2-3 years, so we want to amass a group of knowledgeable and dedicated 
volunteers who understand the time commitment that accompanies engagement with 
this effort. So it would be best to cast the net as early and wide as possible.

Great to see all of you last week.

All my best,
Philip





http://gnso.icann.org/en/news/news-flash-09mar16-en.htm

Date:
 9 March 2016
In Brief
During the face-to-face Council Meeting at ICANN55, the GNSO Council voted – 
with one opposing vote – to adopt the Charter of the recently initiated PDP to 
Review all Rights Protections Mechanisms in all generic top-level domains. A 
call for volunteers will be send out to all GNSO Stakeholder Groups and 
Constituencies within the next two weeks; the same call will also go out to all 
of ICANN’s Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees.
Links
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-26feb16-en.pdf



Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>