ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability

  • To: "egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx" <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:49:36 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: toast.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;toast.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cKZUv4LH2jXZ1NXMODQXlqIzz3LckoP9J+1vnL2sOks=; b=wigAidjuee0eweG6ZwpIUH9sWcRYoHUKsVg9SvXq5F/Em+HRnrL9mktmxqvblm7nJ7tv6zO8Pr4UGgvT/blcX0X4ktgToysSX05LxL8PlAaSGcpWst7MI3LdBFkC4GsOd7eyZjh4RopwkyUq7SzAfk8T4TKifwaHVXu+kjlzivM=
  • In-reply-to: <3c1e39d4815c4131bdba0046bcc2a711@toast.net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D2F36706.62D6B%marika.konings@icann.org> <A416941AD213C9428D623560432AFBB62DDA8873@STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com> <SG2PR06MB11983A3AA2BD05707ED1BBA8CFA60@SG2PR06MB1198.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <D2F4A82B.63414%marika.konings@icann.org> <D2F4B1CC.B0237%jbladel@godaddy.com> <3c1e39d4815c4131bdba0046bcc2a711@toast.net>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHRbz16pyb006H4N0u7BC0FsqPKq587sfFQgADqqKaAAKBJAP//phoAgAB29oD//6CIgA==
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability

Thanks, Ed.

I think we always assumed we would go this route, but wanted to leave the 
option open.  Appreciate you getting in front of this.

Thanks-

J.


From: Edward Morris <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: Edward Morris <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 16:31
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: re: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach 
CCWG-Accountability

James/Donna/Heather,

Thanks guys for all of your hard work. This is good stuff.

I've been in communication with our Member, a few members of the NCSG PC and 
one other NCSG Councillor and it appears that the preference in the NCSG, at 
least amongst some,  is that we hold separate votes on each of the twelve 
recommendations. I thought about holding off on letting everyone know but 
figured it might help for planning purposes if staff and our leadership knew of 
our intent.

As the wording of the Proposed Approach indicated that voting on each 
recommendation individually would be possible if requested by any Council 
member please note that is my intent to make such a request and I do not expect 
that intention will change between today and our open Council meeting in 
Marrakech.

Respectfully,

Edward Morris




________________________________
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 9:30 PM
To: "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach 
CCWG-Accountability

Colleagues -

After working with Donna, Heather and the GNSO Council Staff, I'm pleased to 
present a Draft Motion for the GNSO Council to consider Work Stream 1 
Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Report (attached).

Additionally, we have developed a framework outlining the Council's approach 
when it ultimately moves to vote on this motion (also attached).  While there 
is only one motion, the Council also has the option to conduct a vote on each 
of the 12 recommendations separately.  If we go this route, each recommendation 
will include a discussion / statements by Councilors / SGs /Cs, and finally a 
vote.

Once the vote is completed, we will report the results, along with any written 
statements from Councilors, to the co-chairs of the CCWG-Accountability.

Please review and provide feedback.  We can discuss in depth during our next 
session on 29 FEB.

Thank you--

J.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>