<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] FW: CCWG Final report for your consideration
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] FW: CCWG Final report for your consideration
- From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:29:13 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <D2F24A2B.AFB24%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <13201F1D-1CB2-473C-A284-65081474F66C@sanchez.mx> <D2F24A2B.AFB24%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- Reply-to: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks James,
I ‘d like at first congratulate the CCWG that it came to a conclusion which is
now in front of us – whatever painfull the process was they had to go through.
I’ll immediately initiate the final discussion within my constituency to get
prepared for the council discussion on 29 Feb. The ISPCP call shall be a few
hours before the council call.
I’m sure my fellow councillors doing their best as well to filter out the very
last issues that may exist so that the council at its call could achieve either
- a final conclusion (best dream...) or
- a condensed list of the issues barring SGs/Cs from approval
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:41 AM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] FW: CCWG Final report for your consideration
Right on cue --
Thanks-
J.
From: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 17:20
To: James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Schneider
<Thomas.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>,
Tripti Sinha <tsinha@xxxxxxx>, Brad Verd <bverd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Byron Holland
<byron.holland@xxxxxxx>, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lise Fuhr
<fuhr@xxxxxxx>, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>,
Julia Charvolen <julia.charvolen@xxxxxxxxx>, Tom Dale <tom@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Staff
<staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kimberly
Carlson (kimberly.carlson@xxxxxxxxx)" <kimberly.carlson@xxxxxxxxx>, Bart
Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>,
Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>, David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>,
Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>, ACCT-Staff
<acct-staff@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Crocker <steve.crocker@xxxxxxxxx>, Fadi Chehadé
<fadi.chehade@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: CCWG Final report for your consideration
Dear Chartering Organizations,
The Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability
(CCWG-Accountability) is pleased to provide its Chartering Organizations with
its report on Work Stream 1 recommendations. You can download the full report
here: https://community.icann.org/x/8w2AAw.
As per the CCWG-Accountability’s Charter, we now seek your approval to submit
this final report to the ICANN Board and ask you to consider this approval in
accordance with your respective SO or AC rules and procedures by 9 March 2016
to meet the overall timing requirements, which would allow the IANA Stewardship
Transition (as a whole) to proceed.
The report is the result of extensive work by the CCWG-Accountability’s 28
members, 175 participants and a team of highly qualified legal advisors since
December 2014, which included over 221 calls or meetings, 3 public
consultations and more than 13,900 email messages. It represents a carefully
crafted balance between key requirements, specific legal advice, and
significant compromises by all who participated and includes diligent attention
to the input received through the Public Comment proceedings.
The final proposal has received the consensus support of the
CCWG-Accountability with five minority statements from members recorded for
Chartering Organization consideration (see Appendix A). Please note that we are
publishing our report today with the minority statements delivered by the
original 19 February deadline, but we have given our members a final
opportunity to revise, retract or add minority statements based on our
compromise reached this morning. We will send you a revised Appendix A on 25
February.
As noted in the CCWG-Accountability report, the group worked to meet both NTIA
requirements for the overall IANA Stewardship Transition (Annex 14), and the
CWG-Stewardship dependencies for the naming community on ICANN accountability
enhancements (Annex 13). The co-chairs of the CWG-Stewardship and the
CCWG-Accountability have coordinated their efforts. The CWG-Stewardship will
deliver a letter to you confirming that its dependencies have been met, thus
allowing the IANA Stewardship Transition proposal to move forward.
We will make ourselves together with or other key contributors available to you
before and during the ICANN 55 meeting in Marrakech to answer any questions you
may have and explain any details of the report. For your information, further
background documents as well as the slides, recordings and transcripts of
recent webinars explain the details of the final proposal are available here:
https://community.icann.org/x/ogDxAg.
Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you very much for your continued support.
Thomas Rickert, Mathieu Weill and Leon Sanchez
CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|