ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: [gnso-chairs] DMPM - Community Budget Request

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] DMPM - Community Budget Request
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:54:17 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: gnso.icann.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gnso.icann.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IF8lurHXxWZwVx70r794qUsJzUcoSsIrd6xnW8MDFSM=; b=2hDWY7vKLuTNFWc2GeL4g0f+S55EF5DXmFZeM2cGzR5GVpY0f/KTpCrLtdIgIG/j5jqrMT1BjwiHfenbPm98h//MdPAB+J5G0Es+dYS4URTIoJz3i5HQWqve4jmtXPAmQVztDn8kaL/uu5E/urvLWteuGeyWfAvhr0LhjTgVU0k=
  • In-reply-to: <07ce01d16606$3e504560$baf0d020$@berrycobb.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <07ce01d16606$3e504560$baf0d020$@berrycobb.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AdFl8jMOqFKmrcGCT6C0MTgpNzX2sADAZmWA
  • Thread-topic: [gnso-chairs] DMPM - Community Budget Request

Councilors -

Donna, Heather and I had a chance to discuss this request (attached) today, and 
ask questions of Berry & Staff.  At the conclusion of our discussions, we 
decided to go forward with submitting this Community Budget Request.

However, given the increased scrutiny being given to costs associated with 
policy development work, we raised some specific issues associated with this 
budget request and the DMPM Pilot Program.  Specifically, we examined the 
amount being requested ($50,000USD) and how this figure was calculated.  
Unfortunately, because much of this work is new, this amount is a best estimate.

Also, we've asked for a mid-year check in to track actual expenditures versus 
the budgeted amount.  But given the status of the DMPM project, and the fact 
that the Council previously approved this as part of its work in Dublin, we 
will proceed with the submission.

Below is some additional context from Berry.  If folks have questions or would 
like to discuss further, we will try to save some time on our agenda Thursday.

Thank you--

J.

________________________________

Please find attached a completed Community Budget Request form as part of 
implementation for the DMPM recommendations passed by the GNSO Council October 
2015 (http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201510).  This will be 
posted COB Monday 15 February to meet the deadline 
(https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56987383).

You will recall, that one of the approved DMPM recommendations was the launch 
of a pilot effort whereby the GNSO community and GNSO WGs may submit requests 
for Data & Metrics in the deliberation of policy related issues.  Part of the 
implementation of the recommendations is an update to the GNSO Operating 
Procedures containing the request process and request form.  The updated 
procedures should be published shortly.  Also as part of implementation, this 
budget request is an attempt to secure funds in support of the pilot and it is 
part of a strategy to give the GNSO Policy team the opportunity to manage 
future DMPM requests which will also provide an opportunity for some budget 
flexibility in facilitating the pilot requests.  The budget request also allows 
the pilot to set a stake in the ground that can then be referenced later, if 
necessary, in a formal set of comments submitted in reaction to the overall 
FY17 Ops Plan and Budget proceedings.
________________________________


Attachment: FY17 GNSO Community Request-dmpm_v0.2.docx
Description: FY17 GNSO Community Request-dmpm_v0.2.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>