Re: [council] Re: For your review: Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board on Privacy/Proxy Services Accreditation Issues

[Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Heather and everyone,

I apologize for not being as clear as I should have been. As I understand it, 
the agenda for the next Council meeting will include Council approval of this 
Report as one of the items, possibly as part of the consent agenda. However, as 
the agenda has not yet been finalized, I thought it might be better to note 
this as an expectation rather than as a “done deal”.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
Telephone: +1-603-5744889


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Heather Forrest 
<Heather.Forrest@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Heather.Forrest@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 10:40
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] Re: For your review: Recommendations Report to the ICANN 
Board on Privacy/Proxy Services Accreditation Issues


Dear Mary,


I would be very grateful if you could clarify please your statement at the end 
of the email below ("It is anticipated that approval of this Recommendations 
Report will be on the Council’s agenda for the 18 February meeting."). Is some 
affirmative step needed to put this item on the February Council agenda? It's 
the phrase "it is anticipated" that I'm not clear on, and given the deadline 
for 18 February agenda items, I'd be grateful to hear back from you as soon as 
possible.


Many thanks and best wishes,

Heather


________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf 
of Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 4:54
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] For your review: Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board 
on Privacy/Proxy Services Accreditation Issues

Dear Councilors,

Please find attached for your review a Recommendations Report from the GNSO 
Council to the ICANN Board  concerning the recently-adopted PDP recommendations 
on privacy and proxy services accreditation issues. As you’ll recall, this 
Report is mandated by the ICANN Bylaws, and upon your approval it will be 
transmitted to the ICANN Board along with the Final Report (containing in full 
all the recommendations) from the PDP Working Group.

You may be interested also to know that, again as mandated by the ICANN Bylaws, 
a public comment forum has just been opened to give the public a reasonable 
opportunity to comment on the recommendations prior to any action by the ICANN 
Board: 
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ppsai-recommendations-2016-02-05-en.
GNSO Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Policy Development Process 
Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration - 
ICANN<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ppsai-recommendations-2016-02-05-en>
www.icann.org
name=



It is anticipated that approval of this Recommendations Report will be on the 
Council’s agenda for the 18 February meeting.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889