Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wolf-Ulrich -

Just received all of the submissions from the sub team, and am in the process 
of assembling these. Once complete, we will circulate to the main Council list.

Apologies for the delay, and thanks for your patience.  Please watch for 
something in the next 24 hours.

Thanks—

J.

From: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, January 11, 2016 at 0:38
To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, James 
Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO Council List 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability 
Third Draft Report

James and team,

when we’ll have your findings available?

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


From: WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 11:37 PM
To: James M. Bladel<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> ; GNSO Council 
List<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability 
Third Draft Report

Thanks James and team,

if you could make available the findings before the upcoming weekend this would 
be very helpful with respect to the timely coordination within the SGs/C’s.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: James M. Bladel<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 10:08 PM
To: GNSO Council List<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability 
Third Draft Report

Colleagues -

Attached and copied below, please find a Motion for consideration during our 
special session on 14 JAN to consider the Recommendations contained in the 
Third Draft CCWG-Accountability report.  The small sub team reviewing comments 
submitted by SGs and Cs met today, and finalization of the findings/comments 
contained in the motion will be completed between now and our meeting.

Please note that on todays call we also raised the possibility that a GNSO 
response might be more informal (e.g., letter) rather than a formal motion.  
This will also be part of our discussion on the 14th, but I wanted to have the 
motion submitted to the list in the event that we choose this approach.

Thanks—

J.

________________________________

 Motion on GNSO Joint Position on CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Whereas,


<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council, together with 
other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, chartered the 
Cross-Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability 
(CCWG-Accountability) on 13 November 2014 ‘to deliver proposals that would 
enhance ICANN’s accountability towards all stakeholders.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.     <!--[endif]-->The CCWG-Accountability published 
its third draft proposal for public comment on 30 November 2015 (see 
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en).

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.     <!--[endif]-->All GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) 
and/or Constituencies (Cs) submitted their input on the third draft proposal 
and its 12 recommendations.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.     <!--[endif]-->A GNSO Council sub-team was 
formed to review the input submitted by the GNSO SG/Cs and make a 
recommendation to the GNSO Council concerning a possible joint GNSO position on 
the third draft proposal .

<!--[if !supportLists]-->5.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council has reviewed the 
input provided by the sub-team on the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal.

Resolved,


<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council views on the 
recommendations contained in the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal are 
as follows:

Recommendation #1

Establishing An Empowered Community For Enforcing Community Powers for more 
information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #2

Empowering The Community Through Consensus: Engage, Escalate, Enforce for more 
information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #3

Redefining ICANN’s Bylaws As ‘Standard Bylaws’ And ‘Fundamental Bylaws’ for 
more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #4

Ensuring Community Involvement In ICANN Decision-Making: Seven New Community 
Powers for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #5

Changing Aspects Of ICANN's Mission, Commitments And Core Values for more 
information)

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #6

Reaffirming ICANN's Commitment to Respect Internationally Recognized Human 
Rights as it Carries Out Its Mission for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #7

Strengthening ICANN's Independent Review Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #8

Improving ICANN's Request For Reconsideration Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #9

Incorporation of the Affirmation of Commitments for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #10

Enhancing the Accountability of Supporting Organizations and Advisory 
Committees for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #11

Board obligations regarding GAC Advice

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #12

Committing to further accountability work in Work Stream 2

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments





<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council instructs the 
GNSO Secretariat to share this GNSO Council input on the CCWG-Accountability 
Third Draft Proposal with the Chairs of the CCWG-Accountability as soon as 
possible.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.     <!--[endif]-->Although this GNSO input is 
submitted after the close of the public comment period, the GNSO Council 
expects the CCWG-Accountability to give this input due consideration as it is 
the aggregation of the individual GNSO SG/C positions that were submitted 
before the deadline.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council appreciates all 
the efforts of the CCWG-Accountability to deliver its final proposal to the 
Chartering Organizations in a timely manner and looks forward to considering 
the final proposal in due time.