<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed agenda for the Special GNSO Council Meeting of 14 January 2016 at 12:00UTC
- To: "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed agenda for the Special GNSO Council Meeting of 14 January 2016 at 12:00UTC
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:42:53 +0000
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdFI280B/rhgkX4YQnKeIplXXOMJMQ==
- Thread-topic: Proposed agenda for the Special GNSO Council Meeting of 14 January 2016 at 12:00UTC
Dear Councillors,
Please find the proposed agenda for the Special GNSO Council Meeting of 14
January 2016 at 12:00UTC
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
Procedures,<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-24jun15-en.pdf>
approved and updated on 24 June 2015.
For convenience:
· An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is
provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
· An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Coordinated Universal Time: 12:00 UTC
http://tinyurl.com/ha4rugt
04:00 Los Angeles; 07:00 Washington; 12:00 London; 14:00 Istanbul; 23:00 Hobart
GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast
To join the event click on the link: http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if they will not be
able to attend and/or need a dial out call.
___________________________________________
Item 1: Administrative matters (5 minutes)
1.1 - Roll call
1.2 - Updates to Statements of Interest
1.3 - Review/amend agenda.
Item 2: Opening Remarks (5 minutes)
2.1 - Overview of the purpose of this special Council meeting (James Bladel)
Item 3: Consent agenda (0 minutes)
Item 4: VOTE ON MOTION - GNSO Endorsement of the Third Draft Proposal from the
Cross-Community Working Group on ICANN Accountability (90 minutes)
In the course of discussions over the IANA stewardship transition, the
community had raised concerns about ICANN's accountability, given ICANN's
historical contractual relationship with the United States government. The
community discussions indicated that existing ICANN accountability mechanisms
do not yet meet some stakeholders' expectations. As that the U.S. government
(through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA))
has stressed that it expects community consensus on the transition, this gap
between the current situation and stakeholder expectations needed to be
addressed. This resulted in the
creation<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf>
of a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability
(CCWG-Accountability<https://community.icann.org/x/ogDxAg>) of which the GNSO
is a chartering organization.
In May 2015, the CCWG-Accountability
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-2015-05-04-en>
an initial proposal regarding its work on Work Stream 1 (meant to align with
the timing of the IANA stewardship transition) for public comment. In August
2015, the CCWG-Accountability
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en>
its Second Draft Proposal for public comment. This second proposal included
significant changes to the initial document, arising from feedback received in
the first public comment period. Following community input, including from the
ICANN Board, and discussions at several sessions during ICANN54, the
CCWG-Accountability made further adjustments to its draft recommendations,
resulting in its Third Draft Proposal that was
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en>
for public comment on 30 November 2015. The comment period closed on 21
December 2015, with all Chartering Organizations expected to consider whether
to adopt the recommendations in time for the CCWG-Accountability to send its
final report on Work Stream 1 to the ICANN Board by late January 2016.
Concurrently, the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) - the
community group formed to consolidate the various proposals relating to the
IANA stewardship transition submitted by the Internet communities affected by
the issue - announced<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-10-29-en>
after ICANN54 that it had completed its task. However, before the ICG can send
its consolidated proposal to the NTIA via the ICANN Board, it will first have
to confirm with the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA
Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions
(CWG-Stewardship<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/CWG+to+Develop+an+IANA+Stewardship+Transition+Proposal+on+Naming+Related+Functions>)
that its accountability requirements have been met by the Work Stream 1
recommendations from the CCWG-Accountability. In this regard, the
CWG-Stewardship had submitted a public comment which, while noting that several
of the CCWG-Accountability's latest recommendations adequately satisfied the
CWG-Stewardship's requirements, nevertheless highlighted a number of points
that in its view merited further attention.
In order to meet the CCWG-Accountability's planned timeline, the GNSO Council
had agreed at its December 2015 meeting to form a Sub Team that was to review
all the various public comments from the GNSO's Stakeholder Groups and
Constituencies. Here the Council will discuss the status of the work of the Sub
Team, and if appropriate vote on whether to adopt the CCWG-Accountability's
recommendations.
4.1 - Summary and update from GNSO Council Sub-Team (James Bladel / Philip
Corwin / Keith Drazek / Paul McGrady / Edward Morris)
4.2 - Discussion
4.3 - Presentation of the
motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+January+2016>
(James Bladel)
4.4 - Vote on motion (voting threshold: simple majority)
4.5 - Next steps
Item 5: Any Other Business (10 Minutes)
_________________________________
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3)
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 12:00
Local time between October and March Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA
(PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>)
UTC-7+1DST 04:00
San José, Costa Rica UTC-6+0DST 06:00
Iowa City, USA (CDT<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00>) UTC-6+0DST
06:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+0DST 07:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina
(ART<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html>)
UTC-3+0DST 09:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-2+0DST 10:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 12:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 13:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 14:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+3+0DST 14:00
Perth, Australia
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>)
UTC+8+1DST 20:00 next day
Singapore (SGT) UTC +8 20:00
Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+0DST 23:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2016, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com<http://www.timeanddate.com/>
http://tinyurl.com/ha4rugt
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|